Re: [Swan-dev] expirimental : ipsec device/interface aka XFRMi

2020-02-06 Thread Paul Wouters
On Thu, 6 Feb 2020, Antony Antony wrote: Subject: Re: [Swan-dev] expirimental : ipsec device/interface aka XFRMi CentOS 8 support xfrmi, the back port included kernel-4.18.0-147.el8 https://git.centos.org/rpms/kernel/c/74e6aea855eecc7e3f053ac9837c2b396df80cc7?branch=c8 CONFIG_XFRM_INTERFACE=m

Re: [Swan-dev] expirimental : ipsec device/interface aka XFRMi

2020-02-06 Thread Antony Antony
CentOS 8 support xfrmi, the back port included kernel-4.18.0-147.el8 https://git.centos.org/rpms/kernel/c/74e6aea855eecc7e3f053ac9837c2b396df80cc7?branch=c8 CONFIG_XFRM_INTERFACE=m ___ Swan-dev mailing list Swan-dev@lists.libreswan.org

Re: [Swan-dev] expirimental : ipsec device/interface aka XFRMi

2020-02-06 Thread Antony Antony
I applied this patch and enabled it for CentOS 6,7,8, travis test failed on CentOS 8. It seems CentOS 8 ship with a newer if_link.h inspite kernel-headers version 4.18 Looks like something got back proted? I wonder full xfrmi or just headers CentOS 8, 4.18 kernel Would some one test xfrmi on