On Wed, 12 Aug 2020, Andrew Cagney wrote:
there is also binlog
I agree it needs to be replaced with https://varlink.org/
I don't think we will get there for a 4.0 release though. So the
question is, do we remove binlog for 4.0 or when we replace it
with varlink. It's probably easiest to do
there is also binlog
On Wed, 12 Aug 2020 at 15:56, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
>
> I know I asked this before, but I just wanted to see if anyone changed
> their view on this since the last time. Should we keep or remove the
> nflog support in libreswan?
>
> Since we are doing a 4.0, now would be a
I know I asked this before, but I just wanted to see if anyone changed
their view on this since the last time. Should we keep or remove the
nflog support in libreswan?
Since we are doing a 4.0, now would be a better time to remove it than
one year from now. Get all the incompatible changes
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 08:37:29AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> I'm guessing neither of you use multiple groups of test domains, or if
in my case you are wrong! I have hinted in the previous e-mail how long it
takes to install with 23 groups. Yes I use multiple groups. I have one just
for
I'm guessing neither of you use multiple groups of test domains, or if
you do, there's always a group of domains called east, west, ...
SSH only works for the original east, west, ... domains. Having it
running in any other configuration is pointless - the host can't reach
the test domain's
I started with this e-mail before Paul's request to stop this attemept.
I guess for this round sshd will survive in default install!
However, I post the e-mail to explictly document usecase of ssh for the
future.
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 10:16:53PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Aug 10, 2020,
