On Mon, 5 Apr 2021, Paul Wouters wrote:
I noticed you used salifebytes= and salifepackets=.
I'm still working with these for now.
Since I'm adding code for deleting an IPsec SA when hard timer hits, I
also have a need to ignore a hard timer when testing, so I created two
new impair values "
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021, Andrew Cagney wrote:
Is this something like memory leaks which should be checked at the end of every
test, or can it be limited to the se-linux specific tests where the goal is to,
presumably, tickle these errors?
It should be checked at every test, so we know when someth
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 19:58, Paul Wouters wrote:
> It’s a log of all selinux warnings in permissive mode.
>
>
Is this something like memory leaks which should be checked at the end of
every test, or can it be limited to the se-linux specific tests where the
goal is to, presumably, tickle these er
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 21:14, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2021, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
> > It's simpler.
> >
> > 1) We realise we want to delete a child sa
> > 2) we send the delete
> > 3) we delete it
> > 4) we get a response, but we cannot find the child sa
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021, Andrew Cagney wrote:
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 20:53, Paul Wouters wrote:
I find myself reading the logs and getting confused by additional
messages that come in via some automatic shutdown being called.
I thought running a single test case would not cause th
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 20:53, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I find myself reading the logs and getting confused by additional
> messages that come in via some automatic shutdown being called.
>
> I thought running a single test case would not cause these? Perhaps
> that was never tested with nam
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021, Andrew Cagney wrote:
It's simpler.
1) We realise we want to delete a child sa
2) we send the delete
3) we delete it
4) we get a response, but we cannot find the child sa SPI
Yea, that's too aggressive with deleting the incoming channel. I'm p
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 20:45, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2021, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
> > although the comment is slightly out-of-date. The bit
> SMF2_SUPPRESS_SUCCESS_LOG has been added (more are needed). You could try
> adding it to this transition:
>
> I'll try and play with that.
>
Hi,
I find myself reading the logs and getting confused by additional
messages that come in via some automatic shutdown being called.
I thought running a single test case would not cause these? Perhaps
that was never tested with namespaces ?
Could the automatic shutdown perhaps use ipsec whac
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021, Andrew Cagney wrote:
although the comment is slightly out-of-date. The bit
SMF2_SUPPRESS_SUCCESS_LOG has been added (more are needed). You could try
adding it to this transition:
I'll try and play with that.
Also, I wonder if we should keep a recent list of dele
It’s a log of all selinux warnings in permissive mode.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 5, 2021, at 19:52, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
>
> Could someone enlighten me as to why this appears in final.sh? :-)
>
> ___
> Swan-dev mailing list
> Swan-dev@lists.li
Could someone enlighten me as to why this appears in final.sh? :-)
___
Swan-dev mailing list
Swan-dev@lists.libreswan.org
https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan-dev
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 19:03, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
> Eg see this log:
>
> Apr 5 18:56:32.909849: "west" #4: sent CREATE_CHILD_SA request to rekey
> IPsec SA
> Apr 5 18:56:32.917812: "west" #4: rekeyed #3 STATE_V2_REKEY_CHILD_I1 and
> expire it remaining life 28774.21038s
> Apr 5 18:56:32.91792
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 15:19, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> *From:* Andrew Cagney
> *Date:* April 5, 2021 at 14:49:53 EDT
> *To:* swan-com...@lists.libreswan.org
> *Subject:* *[Swan-commit] Changes to ref refs/heads/main*
> *Reply-To:* swan-dev@lists.libreswan.org
>
>
Eg see this log:
Apr 5 18:56:32.909849: "west" #4: sent CREATE_CHILD_SA request to rekey IPsec
SA
Apr 5 18:56:32.917812: "west" #4: rekeyed #3 STATE_V2_REKEY_CHILD_I1 and
expire it remaining life 28774.21038s
Apr 5 18:56:32.917920: "west" #4: negotiated connection
[192.0.1.0-192.0.1.255:0
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Andrew Cagney
> Date: April 5, 2021 at 14:49:53 EDT
> To: swan-com...@lists.libreswan.org
> Subject: [Swan-commit] Changes to ref refs/heads/main
> Reply-To: swan-dev@lists.libreswan.org
>
> New commits:
> commit f2e9404f55bb3e8e40a9bf1f4cb28e198cb90603
> Aut
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021, Antony Antony wrote:
Here is my sa expire branch rebased to main.
#sa-expire
https://github.com/antonyantony/libreswan/tree/sa-expire
Thanks! I had a look and I think it looks pretty good.
It need a bit more work to merge to main. I look the code again and fix
"FIXME". I
17 matches
Mail list logo
