On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 09:53:49AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Sep 2020, Antony Antony wrote:
>
> > I had a quic look. IKEv1 need extra message (3 round trips) as opposed to
> > IKEv2(2 round trips). And initiator is installing policies in different
> > order.
>
> Yes, I mentioned thi
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020, Antony Antony wrote:
I had a quic look. IKEv1 need extra message (3 round trips) as opposed to
IKEv2(2 round trips). And initiator is installing policies in different
order.
Yes, I mentioned this in the team email two days ago. That is indeed the
source of the problem.
t
I had a quic look. IKEv1 need extra message (3 round trips) as opposed to
IKEv2(2 round trips). And initiator is installing policies in different
order.
the test outputs as it is now are confusing because it seems a copy of IKEv2
outputs. May be create tests with eastnet-westnet, delete IKEv2
On Fri, 4 Sep 2020, Antony Antony wrote:
https://testing.libreswan.org/v3.30-1548-g6ff4d70e27-main/ikev2-xfrmi-01/
showing up as pass. So I am not following the issue.
Lets discuss this further on swan-dev!
That is an ikev2 test case, not an ikev1 test case.
kvmplutotestikev1-xfrmi-01
