On Mon, 4 Jul 2022, Antony Antony wrote:
I worked a bit more on sa-expire branch and rebaseed it to the latest main.
The github PR is updated.
Are there any other feedback?
Looking at the branch now, it shows many commits from 10 hours ago and
not additional commits to the previous state. W
I worked a bit more on sa-expire branch and rebaseed it to the latest main.
The github PR is updated.
Last two commits on the lateset PR are for pluto to use re-factored function
to calculate IKEv1 and IKEv2 margins.
Added more robust fping when a kernel SA hard expire SA and reconnect
trigger
On Jun 26, 2022, at 18:35, Antony Antony wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 02:22:14PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
>>> On Tue, 21 Jun 2022, Antony Antony wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Paul,
>>> Here is a new iteration sa-expire branch. I cherry picked changes from
>>> https://github.com/paulwouters/libreswa
On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 02:22:14PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2022, Antony Antony wrote:
>
> > Hi Paul,
> > Here is a new iteration sa-expire branch. I cherry picked changes from
> > https://github.com/paulwouters/libreswan/tree/sa-expire-2022-01-06
> >
> > and rebased to origin/
On Tue, 21 Jun 2022, Antony Antony wrote:
Hi Paul,
Here is a new iteration sa-expire branch. I cherry picked changes from
https://github.com/paulwouters/libreswan/tree/sa-expire-2022-01-06
and rebased to origin/main.
I have created a PR to make it easy to review my branch.
https://github.com/l
Hi Paul,
Here is a new iteration sa-expire branch. I cherry picked changes from
https://github.com/paulwouters/libreswan/tree/sa-expire-2022-01-06
and rebased to origin/main.
I have created a PR to make it easy to review my branch.
https://github.com/libreswan/libreswan/pull/777
I ignored "" ch
I have rebased the branches a couple days ago. minor fixes to ignore
acquire SA expire. GiB...EiB support.
On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 05:21:36PM -0500, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Nov 27, 2021, at 14:03, Antony Antony wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > I rebased this branch and improved expire handling.
> >
> >
On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 at 14:49, Antony Antony wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 07:23:00PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >
> >
> > One thing decide as group is how to represent big number (2^64)
> bytes
> > and
> > packets, especially the default 2^64 will appear in "ipsec
>
On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 07:23:00PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
>
> One thing decide as group is how to represent big number (2^64) bytes
> and
> packets, especially the default 2^64 will appear in "ipsec status:
> output.
> 18446744073709551615 look ug
On Nov 27, 2021, at 14:03, Antony Antony wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I rebased this branch and improved expire handling.
>
> #sa-expire or #sa-expire-20211127
> https://github.com/antonyantony/libreswan/tree/sa-expire
Awesome. I will have a look.
> I renamed keywords to salifebytes= salifepackets=
You
>
>
>>
>> One thing decide as group is how to represent big number (2^64) bytes and
>> packets, especially the default 2^64 will appear in "ipsec status:
>> output.
>> 18446744073709551615 look ugly:)
>
>
> There's readable_humber() but that would need work.
> Conversely is there something to con
On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 at 14:04, Antony Antony wrote:
> Hi,
> I rebased this branch and improved expire handling.
>
> #sa-expire or #sa-expire-20211127
> https://github.com/antonyantony/libreswan/tree/sa-expire
>
> I renamed keywords to salifebytes= salifepackets=
>
> added few basic checks to avoid
Hi,
I rebased this branch and improved expire handling.
#sa-expire or #sa-expire-20211127
https://github.com/antonyantony/libreswan/tree/sa-expire
I renamed keywords to salifebytes= salifepackets=
added few basic checks to avoid corner cases those netlink calls will return
error:
- do not sen
On Tue, 6 Apr 2021, Antony Antony wrote:
I noticed you used salifebytes= and salifepackets=. I think it would be
more intuitive to call these maxbytes= and maxpackets. Or limit-bytes=
or bytelimit= and packet-limit= ?
given that we have "salifetime" for IPsec and "lifetime" from IKE
I feel lif
On Tue, 6 Apr 2021 at 11:51, Antony Antony wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 01:22:39PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> > On Mon, 5 Apr 2021, Antony Antony wrote:
> >
> > > Here is my sa expire branch rebased to main.
> > >
> > > #sa-expire
> > > https://github.com/antonyantony/libreswan/tree/sa-expi
On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 01:22:39PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2021, Antony Antony wrote:
>
> > Here is my sa expire branch rebased to main.
> >
> > #sa-expire
> > https://github.com/antonyantony/libreswan/tree/sa-expire
>
> Thanks! I had a look and I think it looks pretty good.
>
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021, Paul Wouters wrote:
I noticed you used salifebytes= and salifepackets=.
I'm still working with these for now.
Since I'm adding code for deleting an IPsec SA when hard timer hits, I
also have a need to ignore a hard timer when testing, so I created two
new impair values "
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021, Antony Antony wrote:
Here is my sa expire branch rebased to main.
#sa-expire
https://github.com/antonyantony/libreswan/tree/sa-expire
Thanks! I had a look and I think it looks pretty good.
It need a bit more work to merge to main. I look the code again and fix
"FIXME". I
Hi Paul,
Here is my sa expire branch rebased to main.
#sa-expire
https://github.com/antonyantony/libreswan/tree/sa-expire
It need a bit more work to merge to main. I look the code again and fix
"FIXME". It also need more tests.
If you feel like helping add more tests. This would help to get the
19 matches
Mail list logo