Re: [Swan-dev] naming v2 states

0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Fri, 29 Aug 2014, Matt Rogers wrote: > > >Subject: Re: [Swan-dev] naming v2 states > > > >I like the suggested set at the bottom there. I think avoiding calling the > >resulting states a CHILD and instead calling them IKE or IPSEC is

Re: [Swan-dev] naming v2 states

On Fri, 29 Aug 2014, Matt Rogers wrote: Subject: Re: [Swan-dev] naming v2 states I like the suggested set at the bottom there. I think avoiding calling the resulting states a CHILD and instead calling them IKE or IPSEC is a good idea. I also like the idea of incorporating the intended SA

Re: [Swan-dev] naming v2 states

I like the suggested set at the bottom there. I think avoiding calling the resulting states a CHILD and instead calling them IKE or IPSEC is a good idea. I also like the idea of incorporating the intended SA type in the CHILD exchange's state names. Matt __

[Swan-dev] naming v2 states

We've decided that the V2 state naming is awkward and can be improved. Antony created . I'm treating it as if it is only about naming states (in which case the name of the wiki entry is wrong). Can we rename it? (Sounds awfully meta.) I've added som