On Mon, 17 Aug 2020, Antony Antony wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 03:56:01PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
I know I asked this before, but I just wanted to see if anyone changed
their view on this since the last time. Should we keep or remove the
nflog support in libreswan?
I vote to to keep
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 03:56:01PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
> I know I asked this before, but I just wanted to see if anyone changed
> their view on this since the last time. Should we keep or remove the
> nflog support in libreswan?
I vote to to keep it for now. My reasons below.
> Since
is it the same thing?
On Thu, 13 Aug 2020 at 00:14, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
> On Wed, 12 Aug 2020, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
> > there is also binlog
>
> I agree it needs to be replaced with https://varlink.org/
>
> I don't think we will get there for a 4.0 release though. So the
> question is, do we
On Wed, 12 Aug 2020, Andrew Cagney wrote:
there is also binlog
I agree it needs to be replaced with https://varlink.org/
I don't think we will get there for a 4.0 release though. So the
question is, do we remove binlog for 4.0 or when we replace it
with varlink. It's probably easiest to do
there is also binlog
On Wed, 12 Aug 2020 at 15:56, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
>
> I know I asked this before, but I just wanted to see if anyone changed
> their view on this since the last time. Should we keep or remove the
> nflog support in libreswan?
>
> Since we are doing a 4.0, now would be a
I know I asked this before, but I just wanted to see if anyone changed
their view on this since the last time. Should we keep or remove the
nflog support in libreswan?
Since we are doing a 4.0, now would be a better time to remove it than
one year from now. Get all the incompatible changes
