RE: [SWCollect] MobyScale 0.3.0 -- please review

2000-10-31 Thread Hugh Falk
Only one problem I see. A grade of ED shouldn't include "diskette media bad" for a few reasons: - Over time (let's say 10 to 20 years), a large majority of the disk-based games in our collections would have to be graded ED even if they were in otherwise pristine condition. - You would have to

Re: [SWCollect] MobyScale 0.3.0 -- please review

2000-10-31 Thread Jim Leonard
"C.E. Forman" wrote: > > Looks great to me. No problem with the not-in-all-packages items, I can do > without and it'd be less confusing anyway. > > Any last-minute changes, speak up now! I have no further changes... anyone else? -- http://www.MobyGames.com/ The world's most comprehensive his

Re: [SWCollect] MobyScale 0.3.0 -- please review

2000-10-31 Thread C.E. Forman
Looks great to me. No problem with the not-in-all-packages items, I can do without and it'd be less confusing anyway. Any last-minute changes, speak up now! -- This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed

[SWCollect] MobyScale 0.3.0 -- please review

2000-10-31 Thread Jim Leonard
"Lee K. Seitz" wrote: > > C.E. Forman boldly stated: > > > >Also, an optional modifier we might consider adding is one for those = > >rare items included in some, but not all, game packages, for example the = > >lapel pin and Ral Partha order form in the first 5000 copies of = > >Infocom's "Battl