Re: [swift-dev] Requiring blocks (universally)

> On Jun 24, 2016, at 11:23 AM, Joe Groff via swift-dev > wrote: > > >> On Jun 24, 2016, at 11:05 AM, Saleem Abdulrasool via swift-dev >> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> The blocks runtime itself is pretty tiny, and works across various targets >> already, so including it is not too onerous. As s

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 15.10 (master) #5957

Pushed a fix for the swift-corelibs-foundation failure > On Jun 24, 2016, at 12:23 PM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-15_10 [#5957] > > Build URL: > https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-15_10/5957/ >

Re: [swift-dev] Requiring blocks (universally)

> On Jun 24, 2016, at 11:05 AM, Saleem Abdulrasool via swift-dev > wrote: > > Hi, > > The blocks runtime itself is pretty tiny, and works across various targets > already, so including it is not too onerous. As such, Id like to propose > enabling blocks across all the targets. > > This mak

[swift-dev] Requiring blocks (universally)

Hi, The blocks runtime itself is pretty tiny, and works across various targets already, so including it is not too onerous. As such, Id like to propose enabling blocks across all the targets. This make it easier to then import code on targets which have optional blocks support. For most users,

[swift-dev] Random() in the standard library

Hi, Is there a reason why random() is missing from the standard library? Is it just a matter of someone implementing it? Thanks, James ___ swift-dev mailing list swift-dev@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev