Re: [swift-dev] Endgame for Swift 3

> On Jul 15, 2016, at 10:35 PM, Patrick Pijnappel via swift-dev > wrote: > > Isn't half of this done, or something? I seem to remember seeing code about > it, and I think there may even be a hidden switch to enable what is there. > > The parsing code seems to be in place, toggled by the flag

Re: [swift-dev] Endgame for Swift 3

> > Isn't half of this done, or something? I seem to remember seeing code > about it, and I think there may even be a hidden switch to enable what is > there. The parsing code seems to be in place, toggled by the flag Context.LangOpts. EnableProtocolTypealiases: https://github.com/apple/swift/blo

Re: [swift-dev] Endgame for Swift 3

https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/tree/master/proposals/0092-typealiases-in-protocols.md Isn't half of this done, or something? I seem to remember seeing code about it, and I think there may even be a hidden switch to enable what is there. Sent from my new Email (ht

Re: [swift-dev] Endgame for Swift 3

on Fri Jul 15 2016, Dmitri Gribenko wrote: > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Ted kremenek via swift-dev > wrote: >> Good question. >> >> Dave/Dmitri: do you have a recommendation here? I can see either the JIRA >> issues referencing the proposal (if one exists) or updating the gist. I >> pr

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - OS X (master) #5221

Hmm that was incomplete: Is there a reason why a full toolchain build didn’t pick this up? It seems that when I built locally everything built just fine and tested ok. My configuration that I use to test is a build bot preset that I have modified to have specific destinations such that I can au

Re: [swift-dev] Implementation of swift's value types

> On Jul 15, 2016, at 9:25 AM, Johannes Neubauer via swift-dev > wrote: > > Is there some documentation of the current implementation of Existential > Container, Protocol Witness Table, and co.? Where do I find it? Arnold’s slides are the best I’ve seen! There are some internal details here:

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - OS X (master) #5221

NSLock got renamed back to include it’s NS. > On Jul 15, 2016, at 10:31 AM, Ben Langmuir via swift-dev > wrote: > > These are failing in SwiftPM; and not related to these commits. Did our > Foundation get out of sync from SwiftPM? > > /Users/buildnode/jenkins/workspace/oss-swift-incremental-R

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - OS X (master) #5221

Sorry about the flip-flopping here. We’re trying to finish this out within the next few days. - Tony > On Jul 15, 2016, at 10:36 AM, Daniel Dunbar via swift-dev > wrote: > > ... and to elaborate, I am taking a look at this ... > > See: > > https://github.com/apple/swift/commit/e0ca8fbd80a

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - OS X (master) #5225

I have temporarily configured the job to always delete the workspace. > On Jul 15, 2016, at 2:07 PM, Andrew Trick via swift-dev > wrote: > > Does anyone have permission to clear this workspace? If I don’t hear back > soon I’ll probably have to make a dummy checkin the overlay… > > -Andy > >>

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - OS X (master) #5225

Does anyone have permission to clear this workspace? If I don’t hear back soon I’ll probably have to make a dummy checkin the overlay… -Andy > On Jul 15, 2016, at 1:54 PM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > New issue found! > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-RA-osx [#5225] > > Build URL:https

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - OS X (master) #5221

Great, thanks for fixing it! And thanks for the link... Anders > On 2016-07-15, at 11.10, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > > Should be fixed in fa61cfe3bdae3932f90b34c414ee2c4e1967ebd3 > > - Daniel > >> On Jul 15, 2016, at 10:36 AM, Daniel Dunbar via swift-dev >> mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>> wrote: >

Re: [swift-dev] [swift-evolution] Endgame for Swift 3

On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Ted kremenek via swift-dev wrote: > Good question. > > Dave/Dmitri: do you have a recommendation here? I can see either the JIRA > issues referencing the proposal (if one exists) or updating the gist. I > prefer the former. Updating the JIRA sounds good to me,

Re: [swift-dev] [swift-evolution] Endgame for Swift 3

Good question. Dave/Dmitri: do you have a recommendation here? I can see either the JIRA issues referencing the proposal (if one exists) or updating the gist. I prefer the former. > On Jul 15, 2016, at 11:18 AM, Will Field-Thompson wrote: > > Is there any way to tell which of the changes in

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - OS X (master) #5221

Should be fixed in fa61cfe3bdae3932f90b34c414ee2c4e1967ebd3 - Daniel > On Jul 15, 2016, at 10:36 AM, Daniel Dunbar via swift-dev > wrote: > > ... and to elaborate, I am taking a look at this ... > > See: > > https://github.com/apple/swift/commit/e0ca8fbd80ace8d104eab2fe4fbf75ab107ada01 >

[swift-dev] Endgame for Swift 3

Hi everyone, Swift 3 has shaped up to be a remarkable release — a product of the inspiration, ideas, and hard labor many people from across the Swift open source community. It is now time, however, to talk about the endgame for the release. Here are the key points: The last day to take planne

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - OS X (master) #5221

... and to elaborate, I am taking a look at this ... See: https://github.com/apple/swift/commit/e0ca8fbd80ace8d104eab2fe4fbf75ab107ada01 - Daniel > On Jul 15, 2016, at 10:35 AM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > > Some of the prefixes are coming back. > > - Daniel > >> On Jul 15, 2016, at 10:34 AM,

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - OS X (master) #5221

Some of the prefixes are coming back. - Daniel > On Jul 15, 2016, at 10:34 AM, Anders Bertelrud via swift-dev > wrote: > > That's a surprising failure. The renaming of NSLock to Lock happened some > time ago, and AFAIK the SwiftPM side of this code hasn't changed for a long > time. > > Be

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - OS X (master) #5221

That's a surprising failure. The renaming of NSLock to Lock happened some time ago, and AFAIK the SwiftPM side of this code hasn't changed for a long time. Because of the other CI problems, many of them haven't been able to progress as far as SwiftPM, so I don't know if this is a new issue. Bu

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - OS X (master) #5221

These are failing in SwiftPM; and not related to these commits. Did our Foundation get out of sync from SwiftPM? /Users/buildnode/jenkins/workspace/oss-swift-incremental-RA-osx/swiftpm/Sources/Basic/Lock.swift:11:14: error: no such decl in module import class Foundation.Lock ^

Re: [swift-dev] Implementation of swift's value types

Hi Arnold, > Am 15.07.2016 um 02:17 schrieb Arnold : > >> On Jul 14, 2016, at 4:04 PM, Johannes Neubauer wrote: >> >> Hi Arnold, >> >> Thank you and atr...@apple.com very much for your answers. That helps >> already a lot. Are you Arnold from the WWDC Video? > > Yes. Cool. Thank you for the

Re: [swift-dev] [swift-lldb-dev] Proposal for Swift and Ubuntu releases

Hi Todd, Do you have any updates on the move to Ubuntu 16.04 LTS? Is the plan for Swift 3 GM to support 14.04 LTS and 16.04 LTS? Thanks, Ian Partridge On 24 June 2016 at 04:14, Todd Fiala via swift-dev wrote: > Update: > > I’m now able to successfully run the packaging CI steps on a local Ubu

Re: [swift-dev] Array with associatedtype protocol pattern

> On 13 Jul 2016, at 20:23, 4 bottiglie g via swift-dev > wrote: > > Hi, i have asked the same question : > Here: https://forums.developer.apple.com/message/153781#153781 > > And here : > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/38281800/ar