[swift-dev] swift-3.0-branch is the convergence branch for Swift 3

2016-08-11 Thread Nicole Jacque via swift-dev
Hi All- You may have noticed that last week, as usual, we cut a new branch — swift-3.0-branch — from master when we did the CI update and pushback of source changes. Due to an oversight, I missed mentioning the branch info in my email. (my apologies!) This will be our final preview and rele

Re: [swift-dev] undefined symbol: _TFC10Foundation8NSNumberg25customPlaygroundQuickLookOs19PlaygroundQuickLook

2016-08-11 Thread Dave Abrahams via swift-dev
on Thu Aug 11 2016, Philippe Hausler wrote: > Looks like that is a dirty build. > > I think we should probably just delete the support in > swift-corelibs-foundation entirely for now until a stable interface > can be decided (and also delete the tests for them in > swift-corelibs-foundation). >

Re: [swift-dev] undefined symbol: _TFC10Foundation8NSNumberg25customPlaygroundQuickLookOs19PlaygroundQuickLook

2016-08-11 Thread Philippe Hausler via swift-dev
Looks like that is a dirty build. I think we should probably just delete the support in swift-corelibs-foundation entirely for now until a stable interface can be decided (and also delete the tests for them in swift-corelibs-foundation). This can easily be added back in with little effort (and

Re: [swift-dev] undefined symbol: _TFC10Foundation8NSNumberg25customPlaygroundQuickLookOs19PlaygroundQuickLook

2016-08-11 Thread Michael LeHew via swift-dev
Doh! I forgot to merge that PR. I'll get it now. -Michael > On Aug 11, 2016, at 4:40 PM, Jordan Rose wrote: > > +Foundation-Michael (and Tony). One more test to update? Problem with clean > builds? > > Jordan > > >> On Aug 11, 2016, at 16:15, Daniel Dunbar via swift-dev >

Re: [swift-dev] undefined symbol: _TFC10Foundation8NSNumberg25customPlaygroundQuickLookOs19PlaygroundQuickLook

2016-08-11 Thread Jordan Rose via swift-dev
+Foundation-Michael (and Tony). One more test to update? Problem with clean builds? Jordan > On Aug 11, 2016, at 16:15, Daniel Dunbar via swift-dev > wrote: > > Is anyone investigating this failure on the CI bots: > -- > /home/buildnode/jenkins/workspace/oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu

[swift-dev] undefined symbol: _TFC10Foundation8NSNumberg25customPlaygroundQuickLookOs19PlaygroundQuickLook

2016-08-11 Thread Daniel Dunbar via swift-dev
Is anyone investigating this failure on the CI bots: -- /home/buildnode/jenkins/workspace/oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-15_10/buildbot_incremental/foundation-linux-x86_64/TestFoundation/TestFoundation: symbol lookup error: /home/buildnode/jenkins/workspace/oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-u

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 14.04 (master) #6915

2016-08-11 Thread Tony Parker via swift-dev
It’s mine: commit f71f65e565b0babb22030fe85b7be31c2702d5f8 Author: Tony Parker Date: Thu Aug 11 12:30:31 2016 -0700 I reverted it, will investigate shortly. Thanks, - Tony > On Aug 11, 2016, at 2:39 PM, Tony Parker via swift-dev > wrote: > > I was able to reproduce this; I’ll bisect now.

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 14.04 (master) #6915

2016-08-11 Thread Tony Parker via swift-dev
I was able to reproduce this; I’ll bisect now. - Tony > On Aug 11, 2016, at 1:55 PM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > > Test Case 'TestNSArray.test_sortedArrayUsingComparator' started at > 01:54:49.965 > TestFoundation: > /home/buildnode/disk2/workspace/oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-14_04/swift

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 14.04 (master) #6915

2016-08-11 Thread Daniel Dunbar via swift-dev
Test Case 'TestNSArray.test_sortedArrayUsingComparator' started at 01:54:49.965 TestFoundation: /home/buildnode/disk2/workspace/oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-14_04/swift/include/swift/Runtime/../../../stdlib/public/SwiftShims/RefCount.h:252: bool StrongRefCount::doDecrementShouldDeallocat

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 14.04 - Long Test (master) #693

2016-08-11 Thread Daniel Dunbar via swift-dev
Mine, should be fixed in 66408be65736ad2dfc314a57a00ed5b91b0b1a99. - Daniel > On Aug 11, 2016, at 12:50 PM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-14_04-long-test [#693] > > Build URL: > https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-1

Re: [swift-dev] MemoryError in SIL/parse_stdlib_X.sil tests when building toolchain on Ubuntu 15.10

2016-08-11 Thread Jean-Pierre Simard via swift-dev
Thanks Jordan, that fixed it! Sorry for the noise here, will go straight to file a bug next time. On Thu, 11 Aug 2016 at 10:26 Jordan Rose wrote: > I think this is the spew of deprecation warnings thing I was investigating > yesterday. I just merged the fix for that, so try updating to the lates

Re: [swift-dev] MemoryError in SIL/parse_stdlib_X.sil tests when building toolchain on Ubuntu 15.10

2016-08-11 Thread Jordan Rose via swift-dev
I think this is the spew of deprecation warnings thing I was investigating yesterday. I just merged the fix for that, so try updating to the latest master and try again. Jordan > On Aug 11, 2016, at 10:21, Mishal Shah via swift-dev > wrote: > > Hi, > > Can you please file a bug on bugs.sw

Re: [swift-dev] MemoryError in SIL/parse_stdlib_X.sil tests when building toolchain on Ubuntu 15.10

2016-08-11 Thread Mishal Shah via swift-dev
Hi, Can you please file a bug on bugs.swift.org? Can you please include the commit(sha) you started seeing this? Thanks, Mishal Shah > On Aug 11, 2016, at 10:10 AM, Jean-Pierre Simard via swift-dev > wrote: > > Apologies if this is being tracked elsewhere, but I started getting these > fa

[swift-dev] MemoryError in SIL/parse_stdlib_X.sil tests when building toolchain on Ubuntu 15.10

2016-08-11 Thread Jean-Pierre Simard via swift-dev
Apologies if this is being tracked elsewhere, but I started getting these failures when building the toolchain on Linux. I triggered this by running utils/update-checkout --clone && utils/build-toolchain local.swift on a fresh machine. All other tests pass ( 8457/8459). Any thoughts as to why thi