Re: [swift-dev] TWISt-shout Newsletter 2016-10-17

2016-10-17 Thread Kenny Leung via swift-dev
Yep. Works great. Thanks! * swift:156 - Michael Gottesman (21), Doug Gregor (17), Graydon Hoare (15) This must have been your ploy all along :-) -Kenny > On Oct 17, 2016, at 12:26 PM, Michael Gottesman wrote: > > You don't need to do that. Swift-CI only should be on merge commits (which > y

Re: [swift-dev] TWISt-shout Newsletter 2016-10-17

2016-10-17 Thread Michael Gottesman via swift-dev
; ). Michael > On Oct 17, 2016, at 1:20 PM, Kenny Leung wrote: > > Yep. Works great. Thanks! > > * swift:156 - Michael Gottesman (21), Doug Gregor (17), Graydon Hoare (15) > > This must have been your ploy all along :-) > > -Kenny > > >> On Oct 17, 2016, at 12:26 PM, Michael Gottesman wro

Re: [swift-dev] Semantic ARC and enum projection (Re: Having 64-bit swift_retain/release ignore all negative pointer values)

2016-10-17 Thread Michael Gottesman via swift-dev
> On Oct 17, 2016, at 12:40 PM, John McCall wrote: > >> On Oct 17, 2016, at 10:19 AM, Joe Groff via swift-dev >> wrote: >>> On Oct 17, 2016, at 9:57 AM, Michael Gottesman wrote: >>> On Oct 17, 2016, at 9:42 AM, Joe Groff via swift-dev wrote: > On Oct 16, 201

Re: [swift-dev] Semantic ARC and enum projection (Re: Having 64-bit swift_retain/release ignore all negative pointer values)

2016-10-17 Thread John McCall via swift-dev
> On Oct 17, 2016, at 10:19 AM, Joe Groff via swift-dev > wrote: >> On Oct 17, 2016, at 9:57 AM, Michael Gottesman wrote: >> >>> >>> On Oct 17, 2016, at 9:42 AM, Joe Groff via swift-dev >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Oct 16, 2016, at 1:10 PM, Dave Abrahams via swift-dev wrote: >>>

Re: [swift-dev] TWISt-shout Newsletter 2016-10-17

2016-10-17 Thread Michael Gottesman via swift-dev
You don't need to do that. Swift-CI only should be on merge commits (which you should arguably be ignoring anyways). I think this is what you want: git log --format='%an' --no-merges --since '-1 week' | sort | uniq -c Michael > On Oct 17, 2016, at 12:22 PM, Kenny Leung wrote: > > Hi Michael.

Re: [swift-dev] TWISt-shout Newsletter 2016-10-17

2016-10-17 Thread Kenny Leung via swift-dev
Hi Michael. Yah - It would be nice to find out who the real authors of those changes are, but that would require a much more intelligent parsing of the git history. I’ll work on it… -Kenny > On Oct 17, 2016, at 12:12 PM, Michael Gottesman wrote: > > Suggestion: @swift-ci is not an interest

Re: [swift-dev] TWISt-shout Newsletter 2016-10-17

2016-10-17 Thread Michael Gottesman via swift-dev
Suggestion: @swift-ci is not an interesting contributor in terms of contributor counts. You may want to filter that out of your counts to make that data more meaningful. Michael > On Oct 17, 2016, at 10:35 AM, Kenny Leung via swift-dev > wrote: > > Here is your TWISt-shout Newsletter for the

Re: [swift-dev] Semantic ARC and enum projection (Re: Having 64-bit swift_retain/release ignore all negative pointer values)

2016-10-17 Thread Michael Gottesman via swift-dev
> On Oct 17, 2016, at 10:19 AM, Joe Groff wrote: > > >> On Oct 17, 2016, at 9:57 AM, Michael Gottesman wrote: >> >>> >>> On Oct 17, 2016, at 9:42 AM, Joe Groff via swift-dev >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Oct 16, 2016, at 1:10 PM, Dave Abrahams via swift-dev wrote: on

Re: [swift-dev] Having 64-bit swift_retain/release ignore all negative pointer values

2016-10-17 Thread Michael Gottesman via swift-dev
> On Oct 17, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Michael Gottesman wrote: > > >> On Oct 17, 2016, at 11:53 AM, Michael Gottesman via swift-dev >> mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>> wrote: >> >> >>> On Oct 17, 2016, at 10:00 AM, Joe Groff >> > wrote: >>> >>> On Oct 17, 2016, at 9:57

Re: [swift-dev] Having 64-bit swift_retain/release ignore all negative pointer values

2016-10-17 Thread Michael Gottesman via swift-dev
> On Oct 17, 2016, at 11:53 AM, Michael Gottesman via swift-dev > wrote: > > >> On Oct 17, 2016, at 10:00 AM, Joe Groff > > wrote: >> >> >>> On Oct 17, 2016, at 9:57 AM, Michael Gottesman >> > wrote: >>> >>> On Oct 17, 2016, at 9:4

Re: [swift-dev] Having 64-bit swift_retain/release ignore all negative pointer values

2016-10-17 Thread Michael Gottesman via swift-dev
> On Oct 17, 2016, at 10:00 AM, Joe Groff wrote: > > >> On Oct 17, 2016, at 9:57 AM, Michael Gottesman wrote: >> >> >>> On Oct 17, 2016, at 9:42 AM, Joe Groff via swift-dev >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Oct 16, 2016, at 1:10 PM, Dave Abrahams via swift-dev wrote: on

Re: [swift-dev] Having 64-bit swift_retain/release ignore all negative pointer values

2016-10-17 Thread Joe Groff via swift-dev
> On Oct 17, 2016, at 10:54 AM, Dave Abrahams wrote: > > > on Mon Oct 17 2016, Joe Groff wrote: > >>> On Oct 16, 2016, at 1:10 PM, Dave Abrahams via swift-dev >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> on Thu Oct 13 2016, Joe Groff wrote: >>> >> > On Oct 13, 2016, at 1:18 PM, Greg Parker wrote: >

Re: [swift-dev] Having 64-bit swift_retain/release ignore all negative pointer values

2016-10-17 Thread Dave Abrahams via swift-dev
on Mon Oct 17 2016, Joe Groff wrote: >> On Oct 16, 2016, at 1:10 PM, Dave Abrahams via swift-dev >> wrote: >> >> >> on Thu Oct 13 2016, Joe Groff wrote: >> > On Oct 13, 2016, at 1:18 PM, Greg Parker wrote: > On Oct 13, 2016, at 10:46 AM, John McCall via swift-dev >>>

[swift-dev] TWISt-shout Newsletter 2016-10-17

2016-10-17 Thread Kenny Leung via swift-dev
Here is your TWISt-shout Newsletter for the week of 2016-10-10 to 2016-10-16 https://github.com/pepperdog/TWISt-shout/blob/master/2016/TWISt-shout-2016-10-17.md Enjoy! -Kenny ___ swift-dev mailing list swift-dev@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailm

Re: [swift-dev] copy-on-write proposal

2016-10-17 Thread Dave Abrahams via swift-dev
on Mon Oct 17 2016, Erik Eckstein wrote: > On Oct 16, 2016, at 2:05 PM, Dave Abrahams via swift-dev > wrote: > >> on Thu Oct 13 2016, Joe Groff > > wrote: >> On Oct 11, 2016, at 4:48 PM, Erik Eckstein via swift-dev wrote: This is a propos

[swift-dev] Semantic ARC and enum projection (Re: Having 64-bit swift_retain/release ignore all negative pointer values)

2016-10-17 Thread Joe Groff via swift-dev
> On Oct 17, 2016, at 9:57 AM, Michael Gottesman wrote: > >> >> On Oct 17, 2016, at 9:42 AM, Joe Groff via swift-dev >> wrote: >> >> >>> On Oct 16, 2016, at 1:10 PM, Dave Abrahams via swift-dev >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> on Thu Oct 13 2016, Joe Groff wrote: >>> > On Oct 13, 2016, at 1

Re: [swift-dev] Having 64-bit swift_retain/release ignore all negative pointer values

2016-10-17 Thread Joe Groff via swift-dev
> On Oct 17, 2016, at 9:57 AM, Michael Gottesman wrote: > > >> On Oct 17, 2016, at 9:42 AM, Joe Groff via swift-dev >> wrote: >> >> >>> On Oct 16, 2016, at 1:10 PM, Dave Abrahams via swift-dev >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> on Thu Oct 13 2016, Joe Groff wrote: >>> > On Oct 13, 2016, at 1:

Re: [swift-dev] Having 64-bit swift_retain/release ignore all negative pointer values

2016-10-17 Thread Michael Gottesman via swift-dev
> On Oct 17, 2016, at 9:42 AM, Joe Groff via swift-dev > wrote: > > >> On Oct 16, 2016, at 1:10 PM, Dave Abrahams via swift-dev >> wrote: >> >> >> on Thu Oct 13 2016, Joe Groff wrote: >> On Oct 13, 2016, at 1:18 PM, Greg Parker wrote: > On Oct 13, 2016, at 10:46 AM,

Re: [swift-dev] Having 64-bit swift_retain/release ignore all negative pointer values

2016-10-17 Thread Joe Groff via swift-dev
> On Oct 16, 2016, at 1:10 PM, Dave Abrahams via swift-dev > wrote: > > > on Thu Oct 13 2016, Joe Groff wrote: > >>> On Oct 13, 2016, at 1:18 PM, Greg Parker wrote: >>> >>> On Oct 13, 2016, at 10:46 AM, John McCall via swift-dev wrote: >> > On Oct 13, 2016, at 9:04

Re: [swift-dev] copy-on-write proposal

2016-10-17 Thread Erik Eckstein via swift-dev
On Oct 16, 2016, at 2:05 PM, Dave Abrahams via swift-dev wrote: > on Thu Oct 13 2016, Joe Groff > wrote: > >>> On Oct 11, 2016, at 4:48 PM, Erik Eckstein via swift-dev >>> wrote: >>> >>> This is a proposal for representing copy-on-write buffers in >>> SIL.