[swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: 0. OSS - LLDB Incremental - OS X (master) #5183

2017-02-14 Thread no-reply--- via swift-dev
New issue found!Title: Report [FAILURE] oss-lldb-incremental-osx [#5183] Build URL:https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-lldb-incremental-osx/5183/ Project:oss-lldb-incremental-osx Date of build:Tue, 14 Feb 2017 15:15:53 -0800 Build duration:2 hr 1 min Identified problems:Regressi

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 16.10 (master) #1907

2017-02-14 Thread Vedant Kumar via swift-dev
Yes, I did. > On Feb 14, 2017, at 5:07 PM, Jordan Rose wrote: > > Did you revert yet? This is blocking PR testing for us. > >> On Feb 14, 2017, at 16:07, Vedant Kumar wrote: >> >> I think I'm just going to revert, because it's taking me a while to get >> swift to build. >> >> vedant >> >>>

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 16.10 (master) #1907

2017-02-14 Thread Jordan Rose via swift-dev
Did you revert yet? This is blocking PR testing for us. > On Feb 14, 2017, at 16:07, Vedant Kumar wrote: > > I think I'm just going to revert, because it's taking me a while to get swift > to build. > > vedant > >> On Feb 14, 2017, at 4:07 PM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: >> >> [FAILURE] oss-sw

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 16.10 (master) #1907

2017-02-14 Thread Vedant Kumar via swift-dev
I think I'm just going to revert, because it's taking me a while to get swift to build. vedant > On Feb 14, 2017, at 4:07 PM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-16_10 [#1907] > > Build URL: > https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - OS X (master) #8384

2017-02-14 Thread Vedant Kumar via swift-dev
Taking a look. vedant > On Feb 14, 2017, at 3:32 PM, Jordan Rose wrote: > > Looks like yours, Vedant? > > >> On Feb 14, 2017, at 15:22, no-re...@swift.org wrote: >> >> New issue found! >> >> [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-RA-osx [#8384] >> >> Build URL: https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swif

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - OS X (master) #8384

2017-02-14 Thread Jordan Rose via swift-dev
Looks like yours, Vedant? > On Feb 14, 2017, at 15:22, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > New issue found! > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-RA-osx [#8384] > > Build URL:https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-RA-osx/8384/ >

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - OS X (master) #8383

2017-02-14 Thread Jordan Rose via swift-dev
"Slave went offline during the build". Not our fault. :-) Jordan > On Feb 14, 2017, at 14:41, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-RA-osx [#8383] > > Build URL:https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-RA-osx/8383/ >

Re: [swift-dev] swift-stdlib-tool

2017-02-14 Thread Dmitry Shevchenko via swift-dev
And it looks like this script will stop working with 8.3 release https://github.com/apple/swift/blob/master/utils/swift-stdlib-tool-substitute On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 9:24 AM Dmitry Shevchenko wrote: > Hello, > > It looks like Xcode 8.3b2 removed the swift-stdlib-tool binary. It's a > very usefu

[swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 1. OSS - Swift (Tools Opt+Assert, Stdlib Opt+DebInfo+Assert, Resilience) - macOS (master) #110

2017-02-14 Thread no-reply--- via swift-dev
Title: Report [FAILURE] oss-swift_tools-RA_stdlib-RDA_test-macos-resilience [#110] Build URL:https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift_tools-RA_stdlib-RDA_test-macos-resilience/110/ Project:oss-swift_tools-RA_stdlib-RDA_test-macos-resilience Date of build:Tue, 14 Feb 2017 03:47:00 -

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 16.10 (master) #1892

2017-02-14 Thread rintaro ishizaki via swift-dev
Should I file a JIRA? https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-dev/Week-of-Mon-20170109/003828.html Rintaro 2017-02-14 10:19 GMT+09:00 Slava Pestov via swift-dev : > I’ve seen this before. It would be useful if we kept all old CI logs in an > easily searchable form. > > Slava > > On Feb 13, 2017,