[swift-dev] SwiftPM is hitting assertion `object->refCounts.isDeiniting()

Hi, Can someone please take a look at this: https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-4775 It is blocking PR testing. ___ swift-dev mailing list swift-dev@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev

Re: [swift-dev] Guarantees of Tuples as Fixed Sized (stack allocated) Arrays

Thanks very much John, that's what I expected and hoped for as it's enough to call kevent() for a (kevent_t, kevent_t) used as struct kevent[2] . > On 29 Apr 2017, at 00:28, John McCall wrote: > >> On Apr 28, 2017, at 7:03 AM, Johannes Weiss via swift-dev >> wrote: >> Hi swift-users, >> >> (

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 16.10 (master) #3390

During PR testing we saw “bootstrap failure” - looks different here: Test Case 'PackageDescription4LoadingTests.testTargetDependencies' started at 2017-05-01 15:24:47.575 <>SwiftPMPackageTests.xctest: /home/buildnode/jenkins/workspace/oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-16_10/swift/include/swi

[swift-dev] New global constructor warnings in runtime GlobalObjects.cpp

After updating clang recently, I'm seeing these warnings: /Users/jgroff/src/s/swift/stdlib/public/stubs/GlobalObjects.cpp:40:39: warning: declaration requires a global constructor [-Wglobal-constructors] swift::_SwiftEmptyArrayStorage swift::_swiftEmptyArrayStorage = {

Re: [swift-dev] New global constructor warnings in runtime GlobalObjects.cpp

> On May 2, 2017, at 12:02 PM, Joe Groff via swift-dev > wrote: > After updating clang recently, I'm seeing these warnings: > > /Users/jgroff/src/s/swift/stdlib/public/stubs/GlobalObjects.cpp:40:39: > warning: declaration requires a global constructor [-Wglobal-constructors] > swift::_SwiftEmpt

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 16.10 (master) #3390

It is most likely this: Test Case 'PackageDescription4LoadingTests.testTargetDependencies' - failed On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 2:06 AM, Joe Shajrawi via swift-dev < swift-dev@swift.org> wrote: > During PR testing we saw “bootstrap failure” - looks different here: > Test Case 'PackageDescription4Load

Re: [swift-dev] New global constructor warnings in runtime GlobalObjects.cpp

> On May 2, 2017, at 9:36 AM, John McCall wrote: > >> On May 2, 2017, at 12:02 PM, Joe Groff via swift-dev >> wrote: >> After updating clang recently, I'm seeing these warnings: >> >> /Users/jgroff/src/s/swift/stdlib/public/stubs/GlobalObjects.cpp:40:39: >> warning: declaration requires a gl

Re: [swift-dev] New global constructor warnings in runtime GlobalObjects.cpp

> On May 2, 2017, at 12:57 PM, Joe Groff wrote: > > >> On May 2, 2017, at 9:36 AM, John McCall wrote: >> >>> On May 2, 2017, at 12:02 PM, Joe Groff via swift-dev >>> wrote: >>> After updating clang recently, I'm seeing these warnings: >>> >>> /Users/jgroff/src/s/swift/stdlib/public/stubs/G

Re: [swift-dev] New global constructor warnings in runtime GlobalObjects.cpp

> On May 2, 2017, at 1:07 PM, John McCall via swift-dev > wrote: >> On May 2, 2017, at 12:57 PM, Joe Groff wrote: >> >> >>> On May 2, 2017, at 9:36 AM, John McCall wrote: >>> On May 2, 2017, at 12:02 PM, Joe Groff via swift-dev wrote: After updating clang recently, I'm seein

Re: [swift-dev] New global constructor warnings in runtime GlobalObjects.cpp

> On May 2, 2017, at 10:07 AM, John McCall wrote: > >> >> On May 2, 2017, at 12:57 PM, Joe Groff wrote: >> >> >>> On May 2, 2017, at 9:36 AM, John McCall wrote: >>> On May 2, 2017, at 12:02 PM, Joe Groff via swift-dev wrote: After updating clang recently, I'm seeing these

Re: [swift-dev] [swift-users] Guarantees of Tuples as Fixed Sized (stack allocated) Arrays

> On Apr 28, 2017, at 16:28, John McCall via swift-users > wrote: > >> On Apr 28, 2017, at 7:03 AM, Johannes Weiss via swift-dev >> mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>> wrote: >> Hi swift-users, >> >> (sorry for the cross post to swift-dev, but wasn't sure where it belongs) >> >> I tried to find gua

Re: [swift-dev] [swift-users] Guarantees of Tuples as Fixed Sized (stack allocated) Arrays

> On May 2, 2017, at 4:38 PM, Jordan Rose wrote: >> On Apr 28, 2017, at 16:28, John McCall via swift-users >> mailto:swift-us...@swift.org>> wrote: >> >>> On Apr 28, 2017, at 7:03 AM, Johannes Weiss via swift-dev >>> mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>> wrote: >>> Hi swift-users, >>> >>> (sorry for th

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - OS X (master) #9856

https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/9205 and rdar://problem/31947876 . Huon > On 3 May 2017, at 07:02, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-RA-osx [#9856] > > Build URL:https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-RA-o

[swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: OSS - Swift Package - Ubuntu 16.04 (swift 3.1) #483

Title: Report [FAILURE] oss-swift-3.1-package-linux-ubuntu-16_04 [#483] Build URL:https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-3.1-package-linux-ubuntu-16_04/483/ Project:oss-swift-3.1-package-linux-ubuntu-16_04 Date of build:Tue, 02 May 2017 17:11:30 -0700 Build duration:56 min Id

[swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: OSS - Swift Package - Ubuntu 16.10 (swift 3.1) #605

Title: Report [FAILURE] oss-swift-3.1-package-linux-ubuntu-16_10 [#605] Build URL:https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-3.1-package-linux-ubuntu-16_10/605/ Project:oss-swift-3.1-package-linux-ubuntu-16_10 Date of build:Tue, 02 May 2017 17:11:30 -0700 Build duration:57 min Id

[swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: OSS - Swift Package - Ubuntu 14.04 (swift 3.1) #607

Title: Report [FAILURE] oss-swift-3.1-package-linux-ubuntu-14_04 [#607] Build URL:https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-3.1-package-linux-ubuntu-14_04/607/ Project:oss-swift-3.1-package-linux-ubuntu-14_04 Date of build:Tue, 02 May 2017 17:28:43 -0700 Build duration:45 min Id

Re: [swift-dev] swift-format editor integration

> On Apr 28, 2017, at 8:17 AM, Saleem Abdulrasool wrote: > > Hi Ted, > > I think that what I'm proposing adding is quite small. It has a mirror > equivalent in the clang repository. I thought about it more, and you convinced me. I’m fine with taking it. Can you revise the description in PR