Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 16.10 (swift 4.1) #477

Hi Michael, It’s possible that this test is not deterministic. Some contributors to the project have been working on improving this over time. - Tony > On Dec 19, 2017, at 5:49 PM, Michael Ilseman wrote: > > That’s the thing, there doesn’t look to be a relevant change. Subsequent > builds pa

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 16.10 (swift 4.1) #477

Last change in this area was 5 days ago: 820e3a88 : (5 days ago) Naoki Ishikawa : use optional binding Foundation/URLSession/http/HTTPURLProtocol.swift | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) but that does not look promising as a source of a regression. When did this start fail

Re: [swift-dev] [swift-corelibs-dev] Query on the Foundation API notes.

Hi Mamatha, As part of the development of iOS 11 / macOS 10.13, we actually moved these API note files into the SDK instead of being part of the compiler, to allow framework authors to update them as they changed their headers, rather than requiring compiler changes. - Tony > On Jun 19, 2017,

Re: [swift-dev] [swift-corelibs-dev] Swift Encoders on Linux

n in corelibs-foundation > and saw quite a few differences. Is this something that can be improved or it > is a consequence of the platform differences? > > Thanks, > David. > >> On 23 May 2017, at 17:14, Tony Parker via swift-dev >> wrote: >> >> Hi Ankit,

Re: [swift-dev] [swift-corelibs-dev] Swift Encoders on Linux

Hi Ankit, Our intention is to share as much of the implementation as possible. There are some details that need to be worked out around bridging of types like NSNumber (since bridging doesn't exist on Linux we may need to avoid using 'as' in a few places), but in general it could be as easy as

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 16.04 (master) #2577

Did we lose connectivity to apple.com ? If this test accesses the network we should probably modify it. - Tony > On Apr 11, 2017, at 3:40 PM, Mishal Shah wrote: > > Hi, > > We are seeing this test failure in foundation, and it blocking PR testing. > > Test Case 'TestNSXM

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 16.10 (master) #1550

It looked like a merge failure caused the original pull to fail, but just in case I reverted these 3 commits. - Tony > On Jan 24, 2017, at 10:52 PM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > New issue found! > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-16_10 [#1550] > > Build URL: > https://ci

Re: [swift-dev] builtin command for invoking a subset of the tests

> On Oct 14, 2016, at 9:54 AM, Alexis wrote: > > Oh hey, great! Then perhaps the bigger issue is that this program should be > better highlighted in the developer docs, and possibly even called out in the > build-script docs? > > I agree that it needs a bit of TLC, though. Having to specify t

Re: [swift-dev] builtin command for invoking a subset of the tests

Hi Alexis, In fact there is already a script which is closer to what you want, in swift/utils/run-test. It could probably use some additional love and attention to be a bit more usable (for example, printing out the help if you invoke it with no arguments), but I use it all the time. - Tony

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 14.04 (master) #7678

I merged the PR. Hopefully that will help quite a bit with these. - Tony > On Sep 27, 2016, at 10:26 PM, mishal_shah wrote: > > HI Tony, > > Is this PR ready to be merged? It might help resolve this failure. > > https://github.com/apple/swift-corelibs-foundation/pull/613 >

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 16.04 - Long Test (swift 3.0) #24

Mishal, can you help us get this fixed on the build server? >> I think the fix for this is a one-time forced update (or removal to get a >> clean checkout) of libdispatch on the build machines. >> Thanks, - Tony > On Sep 26, 2016, at 12:19 PM, David P Grove wrote: > > Sorry, > I think the fi

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 15.10 (master) #7860

Thanks Pushkar. I only had one comment on that PR. Looks like we should be able to merge it soon. - Tony > On Sep 26, 2016, at 11:30 AM, Pushkar N Kulkarni > wrote: > > Only the download task tests are disabled. And this is the second time we are > seeing this data task test timing out. >

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 16.04 - Long Test (swift 3.0) #24

Dave, is there something that autoconf is doing here that needs to be adjusted to fit in with the build script? Submodule path 'libkqueue': checked out '1873b1864195ff00e82bec17fa650a89c4575d41' error: Your local changes to the following files would be overwritten by checkout: config.h.

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 15.10 (master) #7860

Hm, I thought the URLSession tests were still disabled? - Tony > On Sep 26, 2016, at 10:41 AM, mishal_shah wrote: > > Hi, > > This failure does not look like released to this commit. > > Foundation test failed due to timeout. > > Test Case 'TestURLSession.test_dataTaskWithURL' started at

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 14.04 (swift 3.0) #177

Is there any more detailed output here? All I see above your summary is every test failing with no additional output... Is this on a different machine or different configuration from master? - Tony > On Aug 30, 2016, at 1:51 PM, mishal_shah wrote: > > After clean build its still failing. > >

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 14.04 (master) #7167

It seems like we have a bug to fix in the timeout logic if it didn’t stop after 12 (seconds I assume) and instead went for 45 minutes. Perhaps we need to accelerate plans to have our test suite start up some kind of local socket to send data over, so these tests are not connecting over the real

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: 0. OSS - Swift libdispatch Incremental RA - Ubuntu 14.04 (master) #159

I think we need a clean build here to pick up the changes from this PR: https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/4458 - Tony > On Aug 23, 2016, at 4:01 PM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > New issue found! > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-RA-libdispatch-l

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 14.04 (master) #7125

I think we may have crossed PRs with the NSCocoaError one. Will fix shortly. - Tony > On Aug 23, 2016, at 3:05 PM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > New issue found! > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-14_04 [#7125] > > Build URL: > https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incrementa

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 15.10 (master) #7394

I reverted the change. - Tony > On Aug 18, 2016, at 2:19 PM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-15_10 [#7394] > > Build URL: > https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-15_10/7394/ >

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: OSS - Swift Package - Ubuntu 15.10 (master) #1901

[TestEqualityOperators.py FAILED] again… - Tony > On Aug 14, 2016, at 1:01 PM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > New issue found! > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-package-linux-ubuntu-15_10 [#1901] > > Build URL: > https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-package-linux-ubuntu-15_10/1901/ >

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: OSS - Swift Package - Ubuntu 14.04 (master) #1899

Jim, this looks like it might be related to your recent commits in this file? 7981be5 : (5 hours ago) Jim Ingham : Test that the presence of a private == operator doesn't interfere with other == operators. (HEAD -> master, origin/master, origin/HEAD) 5a0a89c : (5 hours ago) Jim Ingham : Add a t

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 14.04 (master) #6948

It looks like swiftpm may have adopted ProcessInfo API between the time we staged this change and the time we landed it. I’ll push a fix for it. /home/buildnode/disk2/workspace/oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-14_04/swiftpm/Sources/Utility/Git.swift:128:120: error: cannot call value of non-

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: OSS - Swift Package - Ubuntu 14.04 (master) #1892

This has been failing for too long, so I filed a JIRA and will shortly push a commit to disable the test. https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-2332 - Tony > On Aug 12, 2016, at 9:26 AM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > > Anyone know who/what is tracking this: > > --

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 14.04 (master) #6915

It’s mine: commit f71f65e565b0babb22030fe85b7be31c2702d5f8 Author: Tony Parker Date: Thu Aug 11 12:30:31 2016 -0700 I reverted it, will investigate shortly. Thanks, - Tony > On Aug 11, 2016, at 2:39 PM, Tony Parker via swift-dev > wrote: > > I was able to reproduce this; I’l

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 14.04 (master) #6915

I was able to reproduce this; I’ll bisect now. - Tony > On Aug 11, 2016, at 1:55 PM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > > Test Case 'TestNSArray.test_sortedArrayUsingComparator' started at > 01:54:49.965 > TestFoundation: > /home/buildnode/disk2/workspace/oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-14_04/swift

Re: [swift-dev] swift-corelibs-foundation failing in object conversion when building on Darwin host

We have fixes ready to go for this keyed archiver issue but the inability to get past CI has slowed us down on putting it in. - Tony > On Aug 9, 2016, at 12:02 PM, Joe Groff via swift-dev > wrote: > >> >> On Aug 4, 2016, at 1:21 PM, Philippe Hausler via swift-dev >> wrote: >> >> With a fr

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 15.10 - Long Test (master) #599

Philippe is out. When was this error introduced? - Tony > On Jul 26, 2016, at 5:19 PM, Andrew Trick wrote: > > Phillipe, do you know if these have been fixed yet? > > -Andy > > Foundation/NSURLResponse.swift:372:38: error: value of optional type > 'UnicodeScalar?' not unwrapped; did you mea

Re: [swift-dev] CI trigger request

I kicked it off. - Tony > On Jul 21, 2016, at 1:08 PM, Jacob Bandes-Storch via swift-dev > wrote: > > Could someone kindly trigger CI again for me? > https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/3637 > > > Jacob > ___

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - OS X (master) #5221

Sorry about the flip-flopping here. We’re trying to finish this out within the next few days. - Tony > On Jul 15, 2016, at 10:36 AM, Daniel Dunbar via swift-dev > wrote: > > ... and to elaborate, I am taking a look at this ... > > See: > > https://github.com/apple/swift/commit/e0ca8fbd80a

Re: [swift-dev] CoreFoundation for Windows

sier than my first thought. Before reading the sources, I > imagined the full source porting from the ground up. > > -Han Sangjin > > 2016-05-20 6:29 GMT+09:00 Tony Parker via swift-dev : >> Yes, CoreFoundation is part of iTunes for Windows and other Apple products >>

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 14.04 (master) #4811

Huh, that’s odd. I can’t see how this diff would cause a change in the output of the test. - Tony > On May 19, 2016, at 4:32 PM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > New issue found! > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-14_04 [#4811] > > Build URL: > https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-s

Re: [swift-dev] CoreFoundation for Windows

Yes, CoreFoundation is part of iTunes for Windows and other Apple products on Windows (although the version that ships with those is older than this one, so it’s possible that the CF in swift-corelibs-foundation is not 100% compiling on Windows itself right now). - Tony > On May 19, 2016, at 6

Re: [swift-dev] Libraries written in Objective-C in Swift 3

Hi Chris, > On Apr 25, 2016, at 5:45 AM, Chris Bailey via swift-dev > wrote: > > Is there a view (yet) on if/when/how the "Swift" implementation of Foundation > will be used on Darwin? > > Currently under TestFoundation, the "Swift" version is its imported as > SwiftFoundation on Darwin. Is

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 14.04 (master) #4112

I reverted this commit. - Tony > On Apr 14, 2016, at 2:12 PM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-14_04 [#4112] > > Build URL: > https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-14_04/4112/ >

Re: [swift-dev] [swift-corelibs-dev] LazySequenceType: make prefix return a lazy collection

Hi Mark, I’m going to loop in the swift-dev list for this question. - Tony > On Jan 4, 2016, at 5:15 AM, Mark Aron Szulyovszky via swift-corelibs-dev > wrote: > > Hi, > > I came across hit issue while chaining filter() and prefix() on lazy > sequences: > https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-461

Re: [swift-dev] swift_retainCount in CoreFoundation

Hi Joe, I think we can probably elide CFGetRetainCount from the corelibs-foundation. It’s almost always an anti-pattern to check a retain count anyway (as I’m sure you’re aware since you’re trying to kill the swift version of it). File a bug for us and we’ll get on it. Thanks, - Tony > On Dec