Perhaps
allMembersMatch()
or
everyMemberMatches()
This reads well in use.
On 2017-04-02, 6:18 PM, "Ricardo Parada via swift-evolution"
<swift-evolution-boun...@swift.org on behalf of swift-evolution@swift.org>
wrote:
or perhaps containsOnly()
or maybe allMatch()
or membersMatch()
:-)
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 2, 2017, at 1:57 AM, Rien via swift-evolution
<swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
>
>
>> On 02 Apr 2017, at 07:51, Karl Wagner via swift-evolution
<swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
>>
>> Given the relationship to contains, why not keep it simple and go with:
>>
>> onlyContains(_ element:)
>> onlyContains(_ matching:)
>>
>> [9, 9, 9, 9, 9].onlyContains(9) // true
>> [1, 2, 3, 2, 3].onlyContains { $0 < 3 } // false
>>
>> - Karl
>
> IMO, we have a winner!
>
> Rien.
>
>>
>>> On 1 Apr 2017, at 10:47, Xiaodi Wu via swift-evolution
<swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 3:40 AM, David Hart via swift-evolution
<swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 1 Apr 2017, at 09:50, Brandon Trussell <brandon...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I agree that based on the method name, I thought a collection would be
returned.
>>>
>>> Now that I think more about it, I think you're right. It is confusing.
Perhaps:
>>>
>>> allAre(equalTo: )
>>> allAre(matching: )
>>>
>>> Well, if we're going to go full stdlib naming guidelines, shouldn't
they be--
>>>
>>> ```
>>> areAll(equalTo:)
>>> areAll(matching:)
>>> ```
>>>
>>>> On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 12:36 AM, David Hart via swift-evolution
<swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 1 Apr 2017, at 06:02, Will Stanton via swift-evolution
<swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 to adding, but the name `all` suggests (to me) the return of
another sequence, not a Bool.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not too concerned because the mandatory labels makes it clear.
>>>>
>>>>> Perhaps the function name should be question-like?
>>>>>
>>>>> Suggesting: `membersSatisfy(condition:)` or `allSatisfy(condition:)`
or maybe even just `satisfies(condition:)`
>>>>> The question-like modifier/verb is necessary to suggest a Bool and
IMO not a needless word.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Will Stanton
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mar 31, 2017, at 11:28, Ben Cohen via swift-evolution
<swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hopefully non-controversial, aside from the naming of the method and
arguments, about which controversy abounds
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> swift-evolution mailing list
>>>>> swift-evolution@swift.org
>>>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> swift-evolution mailing list
>>>> swift-evolution@swift.org
>>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Brandon
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> swift-evolution mailing list
>>> swift-evolution@swift.org
>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> swift-evolution mailing list
>>> swift-evolution@swift.org
>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> swift-evolution@swift.org
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution@swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
