Re: [swift-evolution] [Proposal] Allow Static Function Properties to Satisfy Static Function Protocol Requirements

2016-07-13 Thread Jasdev Singh via swift-evolution
Hey Chris, thanks so much for the feedback! > This is an additive proposal, thus out of scope for Swift 3. For sure! Definitely didn’t expect this to land pre-3.0 :) > Beyond that, as someone down thread mentioned, the major thing missing here is a strong motivation for *why* we should do this.

Re: [swift-evolution] [Proposal] Allow Static Function Properties to Satisfy Static Function Protocol Requirements

2016-07-11 Thread Chris Lattner via swift-evolution
> On Jul 11, 2016, at 3:39 PM, Chris Lattner via swift-evolution > wrote: > > >> On Jul 10, 2016, at 1:33 PM, Jasdev Singh via swift-evolution >> mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org>> wrote: >> >> Hey Swift Evolution! >> >> Drafted up a small proposal that harmonizes the use of static function

Re: [swift-evolution] [Proposal] Allow Static Function Properties to Satisfy Static Function Protocol Requirements

2016-07-11 Thread Chris Lattner via swift-evolution
> On Jul 10, 2016, at 1:33 PM, Jasdev Singh via swift-evolution > wrote: > > Hey Swift Evolution! > > Drafted up a small proposal that harmonizes the use of static functions and > static function properties in appropriate protocol conformance scenarios: > > https://github.com/Jasdev/swift-ev

Re: [swift-evolution] [Proposal] Allow Static Function Properties to Satisfy Static Function Protocol Requirements

2016-07-11 Thread Dave Abrahams via swift-evolution
on Mon Jul 11 2016, "L. Mihalkovic" wrote: > Regards > (From mobile) > >> On Jul 11, 2016, at 8:24 PM, Dave Abrahams via swift-evolution >> wrote: >> >> >>> on Sun Jul 10 2016, Jasdev Singh wrote: >>> >>> Hey Swift Evolution! >>> >>> Drafted up a small proposal that harmonizes the use of

Re: [swift-evolution] [Proposal] Allow Static Function Properties to Satisfy Static Function Protocol Requirements

2016-07-11 Thread L. Mihalkovic via swift-evolution
Regards (From mobile) > On Jul 11, 2016, at 8:24 PM, Dave Abrahams via swift-evolution > wrote: > > >> on Sun Jul 10 2016, Jasdev Singh wrote: >> >> Hey Swift Evolution! >> >> Drafted up a small proposal that harmonizes the use of static functions and >> static function properties in appro

Re: [swift-evolution] [Proposal] Allow Static Function Properties to Satisfy Static Function Protocol Requirements

2016-07-11 Thread Dave Abrahams via swift-evolution
on Sun Jul 10 2016, Jasdev Singh wrote: > Hey Swift Evolution! > > Drafted up a small proposal that harmonizes the use of static functions and > static function properties in appropriate protocol conformance scenarios: > > https://github.com/Jasdev/swift-evolution/blob/static-func-static-var/pro

Re: [swift-evolution] [Proposal] Allow Static Function Properties to Satisfy Static Function Protocol Requirements

2016-07-10 Thread Rod Brown via swift-evolution
I only had a passing glance but I'm a fan. > On 11 Jul. 2016, at 6:33 am, Jasdev Singh via swift-evolution > wrote: > > Hey Swift Evolution! > > Drafted up a small proposal that harmonizes the use of static functions and > static function properties in appropriate protocol conformance scenari

[swift-evolution] [Proposal] Allow Static Function Properties to Satisfy Static Function Protocol Requirements

2016-07-10 Thread Jasdev Singh via swift-evolution
Hey Swift Evolution! Drafted up a small proposal that harmonizes the use of static functions and static function properties in appropriate protocol conformance scenarios: https://github.com/Jasdev/swift-evolution/blob/static-func-static-var/proposals/-static-func-and-static-var-func-protocol-