Re: [swift-evolution] [Review] SE-0071: Allow (most) keywords in member references

2016-05-17 Thread T.J. Usiyan via swift-evolution
+1 'default' alone makes this worth it. On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Michael Peternell via swift-evolution < swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: > +1 > I think it's a good thing. I don't think that it would introduce any bad > ambiguities for the human reader. E.g. "case .default:" may look

Re: [swift-evolution] [Review] SE-0071: Allow (most) keywords in member references

2016-04-26 Thread Michael Peternell via swift-evolution
+1 I think it's a good thing. I don't think that it would introduce any bad ambiguities for the human reader. E.g. "case .default:" may look like "default:", but so does "case .`default`:" - all other cases that I can think of don't seem to introduce any problems. > Am 26.04.2016 um 06:20

Re: [swift-evolution] [Review] SE-0071: Allow (most) keywords in member references

2016-04-26 Thread David Rönnqvist via swift-evolution
> On 26 Apr 2016, at 06:20, Chris Lattner via swift-evolution > wrote: > > Hello Swift community, > > The review of "Allow (most) keywords in member references" begins now and > runs through April 29th. The proposal is available here: > > >

Re: [swift-evolution] [Review] SE-0071: Allow (most) keywords in member references

2016-04-26 Thread David Hart via swift-evolution
> * What is your evaluation of the proposal? +1 The new API conventions for member references (especially enums) seem broken without this proposal IMHO. > * Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change > to Swift? I think it is paramount. > * Does

Re: [swift-evolution] [Review] SE-0071: Allow (most) keywords in member references

2016-04-25 Thread Daniel Steinberg via swift-evolution
I didn’t initially think I would care much one way or the other about this proposal, but I find that proposal 0001 has been really helpful in letting me use prepositions such as “for” and “in” as argument labels and I see the same natural applications in this proposal. I think this does fit in

Re: [swift-evolution] [Review] SE-0071: Allow (most) keywords in member references

2016-04-25 Thread Brent Royal-Gordon via swift-evolution
> The review of "Allow (most) keywords in member references" begins now and > runs through April 29th. The proposal is available here: > > > https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0071-member-keywords.md The whole rigamarole would be overkill, so: Absolutely. I