> On May 3, 2016, at 11:26 PM, Gwendal Roué via swift-evolution
> wrote:
>
>> The review of "SE-0080: Failable Numeric Conversion Initializers" begins now
>> and runs through May 9. The proposal is available here:
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0
> On May 3, 2016, at 11:19 PM, Charles Srstka via swift-evolution
> wrote:
>
> Is the proposal to add these initializers to protocols like IntegerType, or
> just to individually add them to each of the numeric types? It’s unclear from
> the proposal, but in case that question hasn’t been deci
> The review of "SE-0080: Failable Numeric Conversion Initializers" begins now
> and runs through May 9. The proposal is available here:
>
>
> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0080-failable-numeric-initializers.md
Hello,
I'm all for it, but I'd like a clarif
On May 3, 2016, at 9:19 PM, Charles Srstka wrote:
> Is the proposal to add these initializers to protocols like IntegerType, or
> just to individually add them to each of the numeric types? It’s unclear from
> the proposal, but in case that question hasn’t been decided yet, I’d like to
> vote f
Is the proposal to add these initializers to protocols like IntegerType, or
just to individually add them to each of the numeric types? It’s unclear from
the proposal, but in case that question hasn’t been decided yet, I’d like to
vote for putting them in the protocols. It’s bugged me for a whil
Hello Swift community,
The review of "SE-0080: Failable Numeric Conversion Initializers" begins now
and runs through May 9. The proposal is available here:
https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0080-failable-numeric-initializers.md
Reviews are an important part
