It looks like a `hidden` access control has been discussed before:
https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/Week-of-Mon-20170213/031881.html
Not directly related, but would serve a similar purpose.
I'm fairly sure whether it's revisiting protected, or something like
'hidden' with special
Yes, sorry. First and foremost I'm referencing SPI access control as
mentioned in
https://github.com/apple/swift/blob/master/docs/LibraryEvolution.rst#backdating,
https://github.com/apple/swift/blob/master/docs/AccessControlInStdlib.rst#public
,
https://github.com/apple/swift/blob/master/docs/Acces
Could you clarify? What do you hope to achieve beyond access/visibility control?
> Le 14 août 2017 à 07:19, Mathew Huusko V via swift-evolution
> a écrit :
>
> Curious if SPI access/visibility control has been discussed/planned? I know
> the standard access control debate is long past, but thi
Curious if SPI access/visibility control has been discussed/planned? I know
the standard access control debate is long past, but this still seams
rather important, especially for stdlib (and would presumably have ABI
implications) and other large frameworks.
