Re: [swift-evolution] Inquiry: Status of SR-122 ?

2016-01-03 Thread plx via swift-evolution
Thanks for pointing me at it; at a quick read I like the functionality, but will have to take a closer look to get a sense of its feel in use. It certainly addresses the current gripes I have around `CollectionType` requiring a `ForwardIndexType`: for all but the truly-linear collections (e.g.,

Re: [swift-evolution] Inquiry: Status of SR-122 ?

2016-01-02 Thread Dmitri Gribenko via swift-evolution
On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 4:53 AM, Dave Abrahams via swift-evolution wrote: > >> On Jan 1, 2016, at 4:34 PM, plx via swift-evolution >> wrote: >> >> I was preparing a proposal-sketch relating to this earlier discussion: >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/1629 >> >> …which

Re: [swift-evolution] Inquiry: Status of SR-122 ?

2016-01-01 Thread Dave Abrahams via swift-evolution
> On Jan 1, 2016, at 4:34 PM, plx via swift-evolution > wrote: > > I was preparing a proposal-sketch relating to this earlier discussion: > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/1629 > > …which is largely about inserting "intermediate steps” between `SequenceType` > and `C

[swift-evolution] Inquiry: Status of SR-122 ?

2016-01-01 Thread plx via swift-evolution
I was preparing a proposal-sketch relating to this earlier discussion: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/1629 …which is largely about inserting "intermediate steps” between `SequenceType` and `CollectionType`, but to get the full benefit would likely wind up requiring mod