Hi Jonathan,
It looks like the majority of this is about finite vs infinite collections.
This should be a separate thread, and one we certainly need to have, but
doesn’t need to be mixed together with the wider one-sided ranges discussion.
For now, I think it’s reasonable to say that 1) left-on
>> Oh, sorry, I was referring to an earlier post I made in this thread,
>> but didn’t make that clear. I’ll give a longer explanation of my
>> reasoning behind the statement that partial ranges shouldn’t conform
>> to Sequence (on their own) below... but the short version is that the
>> conforman
on Sun Feb 05 2017, Jonathan Hull wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, what are the use-cases for an infinite sequence
> (as opposed to a sequence which is bounded to the type’s representable
> values)?
1. The type may not have an inherent expressible bound (see BigInt,
>
