Re: [swift-evolution] Value Subtypes and Generalized Enums, a manifesto

Sent from my iPad > On Feb 16, 2017, at 5:40 PM, Karl Wagner wrote: > > >>> On 17 Feb 2017, at 00:26, Matthew Johnson wrote: >>> >>> On Feb 16, 2017, at 5:13 PM, Karl Wagner wrote: > On 17 Feb 2017, at

Re: [swift-evolution] Value Subtypes and Generalized Enums, a manifesto

> On 17 Feb 2017, at 00:26, Matthew Johnson wrote: > >> >> On Feb 16, 2017, at 5:13 PM, Karl Wagner > > wrote: >> >> >>> On 17 Feb 2017, at 00:00, Karl Wagner >>

Re: [swift-evolution] Value Subtypes and Generalized Enums, a manifesto

> On Feb 16, 2017, at 5:13 PM, Karl Wagner wrote: > > >> On 17 Feb 2017, at 00:00, Karl Wagner > > wrote: >> >> >>> On 16 Feb 2017, at 23:44, Matthew Johnson via swift-evolution >>>

Re: [swift-evolution] Value Subtypes and Generalized Enums, a manifesto

> On 17 Feb 2017, at 00:00, Karl Wagner wrote: > > >> On 16 Feb 2017, at 23:44, Matthew Johnson via swift-evolution >> > wrote: >> >> I have been thinking a lot about enums and value subtyping lately and

Re: [swift-evolution] Value Subtypes and Generalized Enums, a manifesto

> On Feb 16, 2017, at 5:00 PM, Karl Wagner wrote: > > >> On 16 Feb 2017, at 23:44, Matthew Johnson via swift-evolution >> > wrote: >> >> I have been thinking a lot about enums and value subtyping lately and >>

Re: [swift-evolution] Value Subtypes and Generalized Enums, a manifesto

> On 16 Feb 2017, at 23:44, Matthew Johnson via swift-evolution > wrote: > > I have been thinking a lot about enums and value subtyping lately and decided > to write down the ideas I’ve been thinking about. The result is a > manifesto-style document that explores

[swift-evolution] Value Subtypes and Generalized Enums, a manifesto

I have been thinking a lot about enums and value subtyping lately and decided to write down the ideas I’ve been thinking about. The result is a manifesto-style document that explores a broad landscape of features that could eventually lead to proposals (at the right time, of course). I’m