2016-03-16 2:03 GMT+09:00 Joe Groff :
>
> On Mar 15, 2016, at 6:39 AM, Yuta Koshizawa wrote:
>
> 2016-03-15 2:23 GMT+09:00 Joe Groff :
>
>
> Yeah, we extensively discussed adding a Result type internally, but
> ultimately couldn't justify it. The only real use case we could see in the
> wild was f
> On Mar 15, 2016, at 6:39 AM, Yuta Koshizawa wrote:
>
> 2016-03-15 2:23 GMT+09:00 Joe Groff :
>>
>> Yeah, we extensively discussed adding a Result type internally, but
>> ultimately couldn't justify it. The only real use case we could see in the
>> wild was for threading errors through CPS-inv
2016-03-15 2:23 GMT+09:00 Joe Groff :
>
> Yeah, we extensively discussed adding a Result type internally, but
> ultimately couldn't justify it. The only real use case we could see in the
> wild was for threading errors through CPS-inversion-style abstractions like
> async promises, something we hop
