There are different algorithms for Element==CGPoint, Element==[CGPoint],
Element==[AreaPoint], etc…
Your second suggestion work:
protocol Inertial {
funcconvexHull( _ t:AffineTransform? ) -> [CGPoint]
funcarea( _ t:AffineTransform? ) -> CGFloat
funcfirstOrde
Hi Antonio,
This is explicitly mentioned in the original proposal. We do not allow multiple
conditional conformances to be defined for the same type. Instead, is it
possible to express your conformance as follows?
extension Array : Intertial where Element : Inertial { … }
Or do you really need
Hi Volodymyr,
The format is not documented anywhere and is subject to change. A good starting
point is include/swift/Serialization/ModuleFormat.h, but I would first be
curious to know what exactly you’re planning on doing with it.
It might be better to extend swift-ide-test and similar utilitie
I’have a protocol:
protocol Inertial {
funcconvexHull( _ t:AffineTransform? ) -> [CGPoint]
funcarea( _ t:AffineTransform? ) -> CGFloat
funcfirstOrderMomentums( _ t:AffineTransform? ) ->
(x:CGFloat,y:CGFloat)
funcsecondOrderMomentums( _ t:AffineTrans
On 11/14/17, Saleem Abdulrasool wrote:
> I’ve not used the MSVC build mode very much. I suspect that this is a name
> lookup failure and needs a namespace qualification. I’ll look into
> tweaking that when I’m near a computer. In the mean time, I recommend
> using the cross-compile or possibly
Hi
Where to read about *.swiftmodule file format?
And *.swiftdoc
I want to understand container of it.
would be good to have parser for third party IDEs.
Best regards,
Volodymyr Boichentsov
___
swift-users mailing list
swift-users@swift.org
h
