> On Sep 24, 2017, at 1:52 AM, Trevör ANNE DENISE via swift-users
> wrote:
>
> Hello everyone, I found this on StackOverflow :
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/46381752/swift-4-methods-chaining/
>
> On Mar 24, 2017, at 3:08 AM, Toni Suter via swift-users
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> If I declare a variable and initialize it with an array literal whose
> elements are integer literals and nil literals,
> the compiler will infer the type Array for that variable:
ithin the last couple months so you need to be
> using a recent build in order to use this command-line option. Where did the
> compiler that you tried it with come from?
>
> Mark
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Piotr
>>
>> czw., 23 mar 2017 o 08:54 użytk
d to be
using a recent build in order to use this command-line option. Where did the
compiler that you tried it with come from?
Mark
>
> Regards,
> Piotr
>
> czw., 23 mar 2017 o 08:54 użytkownik Mark Lacey via swift-users
> <swift-users@swift.org <mailto:swift-users@swi
> On Mar 23, 2017, at 12:32 AM, Rien via swift-users
> wrote:
>
>
>> On 23 Mar 2017, at 08:27, David Hart wrote:
>>
>> Yes, it's best to avoid concatenating strings with +. Not only for
>> performance reasons, but it's also less readable than
> On Nov 14, 2016, at 2:05 PM, Toni Suter via swift-users
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would have expected that the following code reports an error, because
> of ambiguous function overloads:
>
> infix operator ***: MultiplicationPrecedence
> infix operator +++:
> On Oct 6, 2016, at 4:53 AM, Toni Suter via swift-users
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Does someone know a good explanation / summary of Swift's overload resolution
> rules?
> After reading https://github.com/apple/swift/blob/master/docs/TypeChecker.rst
>
> On Sep 30, 2016, at 5:02 AM, Toni Suter via swift-users
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to get a better understanding of Swift's function overload
> resolution rules.
> As far as I can tell, if there are multiple candidates for a function call,
> Swift favors
>
> On Aug 4, 2016, at 8:51 PM, Saagar Jha via swift-users
> wrote:
>
> Hello Swift Users,
>
> This afternoon I updated my Xcode to Xcode 8 beta 4, and tried to compile one
> of my previously migrated Swift 3 projects. Along with a couple of renames,
> the compiler kept
> On Jun 16, 2016, at 10:18 PM, Martin R via swift-users
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I wonder why the Swift compiler does not complain about the
> redeclaration of `number` after the guard-statement in top-level code:
>
>// main.swift
>import Swift
>
>guard let
10 matches
Mail list logo