[cc'ing to j2d]
On 12.12.2013 1:30, Jim Graham wrote:
On 12/11/13 2:40 AM, Anton V. Tarasov wrote:
On 10.12.2013 23:57, Anthony Petrov wrote:
I think that the image shouldn't be aware of any scale.
The "scale" field put into the BufferedImage class means that an image
instance should (or s
[cc'ing to j2d]
On 11.12.2013 23:14, Anthony Petrov wrote:
Hi Anton,
On 12/11/2013 02:40 PM, Anton V. Tarasov wrote:
2. I'm not sure if adding the scale field to the BI is a good idea. I
think that the image shouldn't be aware of any scale. After all, it's
just an image, a bitmap. It has its r
[cc'ing to j2d]
On 11.12.2013 23:14, Anthony Petrov wrote:
Hi Anton,
On 12/11/2013 02:40 PM, Anton V. Tarasov wrote:
2. I'm not sure if adding the scale field to the BI is a good idea. I
think that the image shouldn't be aware of any scale. After all, it's
just an image, a bitmap. It has its r
On 12/11/13 2:40 AM, Anton V. Tarasov wrote:
On 10.12.2013 23:57, Anthony Petrov wrote:
I think that the image shouldn't be aware of any scale.
The "scale" field put into the BufferedImage class means that an image
instance should (or shouldn't) be treated as a HiDPI image by the
Graphics.dr
