Hello,
For future CSR requests involving system properties, please document the
properties using these javadoc facilities.
Thanks,
-Joe
On 11/14/2018 2:27 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
This is an FYI to announce some initial, long-overdue support in
javadoc for documenting system properties
PS Discussion of the next iteration of tiered testing:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk9-dev/2015-June/002325.html
Thanks,
-Joe
On 6/24/2015 4:42 PM, joe darcy wrote:
Hello,
To support the next iteration of tiered testing in JDK 9, with an eye
toward running client library tests,
Hi Sergey,
I pushed a version of the fix with reordered tags; thanks for the review,
-Joe
On 4/14/2015 12:13 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hi, Joe.
Small issue in AsyncBoxView.java where incorrect order of tags is
used(@return should be after @param). Other than that the fix looks good.
Hello,
Another turn at missing doclint cleanup, this time for
JDK-8077094: Fix missing doclint warnings in the javax.swing.plaf
package
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/8077094.0/
Thanks,
-Joe
Hello,
The previously proposed fix for
JDK-8055059: JDK9b22 public API exposes package private classes
was rejected during code review:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2014-August/003829.html
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2014-August/003830.html
Here
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
Peter,
Earlier today you pushed Nimbus into the JDK 7 Swing forest [1]. I'm
happy to see Nimbus get in, but later on the #openjdk IRC channel Andrew
Hughes pointed out that the changes include seven binary jar files [2].
When we open-sourced JDK 7 we took great pains