Hi, Joe.
The fix looks good.
On 10.01.2015 3:23, Joseph D. Darcy wrote:
Hello,
The previously proposed fix for
JDK-8055059: JDK9b22 public API exposes package private classes
was rejected during code review:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2014-August/003829.html
The fix looks good to me.
Could you formate the code to have a space between type cast
(UndoPosRef) and the positions variable?
780 UndoPosRef ref =
(UndoPosRef)positions.elementAt(counter);
Thanks,
Alexandr.
On 1/10/2015 3:23 AM, Joseph D. Darcy wrote:
Hello,
+1
-phil.
On 1/12/2015 1:13 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hi, Joe.
The fix looks good.
On 10.01.2015 3:23, Joseph D. Darcy wrote:
Hello,
The previously proposed fix for
JDK-8055059: JDK9b22 public API exposes package private classes
was rejected during code review:
Hello,
The previously proposed fix for
JDK-8055059: JDK9b22 public API exposes package private classes
was rejected during code review:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2014-August/003829.html
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2014-August/003830.html
Here