Re: [swinog] Re: blocking ports?

2007-04-13 Diskussionsfäden Schmid
isn't the most spam comming via compromized Computers ? adsl Dynamic or dialup user you should never trust them if the say the dont spam. they have to send mail the way smtp is thought for, that means send email to the smtp relay next to you. prevent him to send email via any other relay. if

RE: [swinog] Re: blocking ports?

2007-04-13 Diskussionsfäden Ladu, Daniele
* Block destination port 25. This prevents bots from sending email directly to the victims MXes. No one wants to (must not) run an MTA in a dialup range: Many MXes dont accept emails orginating from dial-up rages. No one wants to (must not) run an MX in a dial-up range. The risk of delaying

[swinog] Question about new FMG an the Meldestelle

2007-04-13 Diskussionsfäden Ladu, Daniele
Dear all I have a question regarding the Meldestelle that need to be active since 01.04.2007 for SPAM issues. Can someone explain me, where i can send SMS Spam requests regarding Art. 45 Abs. 2 from the FMG for a SMS Spam that was sent from a Swisscom SMSC ? [EMAIL PROTECTED] seems to

Re: [swinog] Re: blocking ports?

2007-04-13 Diskussionsfäden Scott Weeks
: but still voting to block mail from dialup and adsl ranges On DHCP DSL ranges. I see some businesses that have a legitimate email server on statically assigned DSL ranges... scott --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Schmid [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]