On 10 Aug 2010, at 11:18, Fredy Kuenzler wrote:
> Disagree. This is the first spam in the list for years. If you find at least
> three volounteers to moderate the list with guaranteed response time we can
> talk about moderation, but even then I don't think it's necessary. This list
> became r
Hi, Stanislav, everyone --
On 11 Oct 2010, at 19:34, Stanislav Sinyagin wrote:
> I'm currently working on a new open-source project. Many of you
> know the imperfections of RANCID software, and this project is made to
> dramatically change this.
This is great news, we use rancid all of the tim
On 15 Nov 2010, at 10:27, Viktor Steinmann wrote:
> Wouldn't that do it?
>
> !
> route-map bar deny 10
> match invalid
Hi,
Works *only* if you had a direct adjacency with the network being spoofed. If
your upstream sends you a /22, and a spoofed /24, you can drop the spoofed /24,
but as soo
On 11 Jul 2011, at 17:23, Patrick Studer wrote:
> We want to go a step further with our infrastructure and start
> testing/implementing IPv6.
>
> Has anybody here a 7206VXR + NPE400 running and doing IPv6 / Full BGP /
> 4-byte ASN? If yes, which
> IOS Version and Package do you have installed
Hi, Chris
You wrote:
> I need to transparently (especially LACP frames) transport a gigabit
> ethernet link with at least 1500 MTU over either IP or Ethernet. Jumbo
> frames are enabled on the L2 transport backbone. While I need "full"
> (some encap overhead will be acceptable) GigE wire speed, en
On 15 Jan 2009, at 19:08, Silvan Gebhardt wrote:
> I just read about the blocking of archive.org (which is for me an
> ususal site(!)
> (http://www.heise.de/newsticker/Britische-Jugendschuetzer-lassen-Internet-Archiv-blockieren--/meldung/121754
> ) is one source, which refers to
> http://www.the
On 26 Feb 2009, at 08:50, Andreas Fink wrote:
> Sorry but "most windows PCs and home servers would need some tuning
> for v6" is just WRONG.
> If you have a proper configured IPv6 router and you plug a MacOS X
> or Linux box, they get IPv6 addresses automatically and are
> connected. This is
On 26 Feb 2009, at 12:09, Stanislav Sinyagin wrote:
> At home, 80% of computers are not ipv6 ready, and 99% of users have
> no idea what it is.
> In mass-market hardware shops, ipv6 is terra incognita.
They don't know what ipv4 is. The users just want the services. The
role of the ISP and
On 26 Feb 2009, at 16:34, Leo Vegoda wrote:
> Just labelling things as "new" doesn't mean they'll sell. People
> will want
> to know what what "new" features they'll get on the "new" Internet.
> Will it
> be faster? Will there be new content? With DOCSIS 3.0 there is the
> promise
> of fast
On 20 Apr 2009, at 21:49, Peter Guhl Listenempfänger wrote:
> Well, it depends. While blocking without loggin isn't good for
> anything at all
In the UK we have -- we are told -- blocking without logging, because
the intent of the blocking is to prevent the *accidental* discovery of
child
On 22 Jun 2009, at 23:25, Reza Kordi wrote:
> I am looking for a redundant pair of BGP routers to deal with 0.5-1
> Gbps Internet upstreams capacity with currently 5 but growing number
> of interconnects.
>
> Not sure which Cisco or Juniper platform would fit best still
> leaving some headr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Leo Vegoda wrote:
> I am at ITU World in Geneva and have just spoken to a gentleman who
> wants to buy IPv6 transit for his multi-homed network. I’d like to
> e-mail him a list of ISPs that offer IPv6 transit services but don’t
> think I know all the S
Stanislav Sinyagin wrote:
> some time ago we already discussed that there's no killer application that
> would
> push the ipv6 deployment forward.
Errr, more addresses.
Wait until there's no more v4 left. Bang. Killer app.
Andy
___
swinog mail
On 28 Jan 2010, at 12:12, Luca Cappiello wrote:
> I'm curious if anybody knows a good framework/application, which is used
> for functional tests in enterprise environments. Are any solutions out
> there, able to perform a operational check of all services (databases,
> remote access, running pro
On 10 May 2010, at 13:00, tu...@tuxli.net wrote:
> are there any 4-byte ASN ranges reserved for private use?
No - in the 'after world', when everyone is running router code that can
support as4, there intention of the assignment policy is that there will be no
distinction between 0-65535 and 6
15 matches
Mail list logo
