Re: [swinog] IP protection in Switzerland

2012-09-22 Diskussionsfäden Peter Guhl
Am 21.09.2012 18:21, schrieb Alexandre Egger: For those of you who have some spare time this weekend, there is a piece of entertainment written by the so-called USA government which sack [...] […] *Switzerland* Switzerland’s copyright law is inadequate, making it a home for rogue sites whose

Re: [swinog] port 25 outbound

2010-10-25 Diskussionsfäden Peter Guhl
Am 25.10.10 13:47, schrieb Jeroen Massar: On 2010-10-25 12:49, Manfredo Miserocchi wrote: users coming from Apple stores with their new IPhone, cannot send out their e-mail from a day to another and they're not understanding why :D Just one comment: Apple Geniuses should know better...

Re: [swinog] Port 25 Blockade @ Swisscom (Bluewin)

2010-03-10 Diskussionsfäden Peter Guhl
Oli Schacher schrieb: Is there any chance Swisscom could change these antispam error messages to CLEARLY indidicate they are generated by the Swisscom servers? You seem to have got an old message somehow. I got one today from the first one of our customers which is affected and this one was

Re: [swinog] Censurship in Germany Take 2

2009-04-20 Diskussionsfäden Peter Guhl Listenempfänger
Andreas Fink schrieb: its getting worse: http://www.heise.de/newsticker/Kinderporno-Sperren-Provider-sollen-Nutzerzugriffe-loggen-duerfen--/meldung/136450 Well, it depends. While blocking without loggin isn't good for anything at all and logging without blocking would be a rather good idea

Re: [swinog] Netclean - news

2008-12-10 Diskussionsfäden Peter Guhl
Hi Fredy Kuenzler schrieb: Peter Keel schrieb: * on the Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 09:54:11AM +0100, Marc Hauswirth wrote: block their Internet access to block pedophile content. The opposite of good is good intent. As said earlier, IMHO the authorities should purchase the system for all

Re: [swinog] Cablecom Winterthur blocking outgoing SMB connections?

2007-12-12 Diskussionsfäden Peter Guhl Listenempfänger
Hi Tobias Goeller schrieb: I have a current malicious traffic of about 100KBit/s coming from some chinese ISPs... most time they try to accesss ports 138/139 and 445. That's incomming traffic, I guess. Blocking that is a good idea. Blocking outgoing smb is not entirely pointless too since it

Re: [swinog] Eines der ersten Urteile gegen Spamer ist draussen

2007-09-04 Diskussionsfäden Peter Guhl
Per Jessen schrieb: Xaver Aerni wrote: Hallo, Der Kanton Zug hat das erste Urteil gegen das Antispamgesetz verkündet. Dabei stellte es sich auf den gesichtspunkt, dass ein Abmeldelink alleine genügt. Auf die Punkte, das der Kläger weder eine Einwilligung gegeben habe und auch keine

Re: [swinog] SMS alerting solution

2007-08-06 Diskussionsfäden Peter Guhl
Hi Daniel Kamm schrieb: On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 14:01 +0200, Peter Guhl wrote: Major drawback: If your link is broken, you won't get alarmed! Of course. Something like this would be nice: if (aspsms available) send_via_aspsms else send_via_attached_gsm That's easy to script. Start

Re: [swinog] SMS alerting solution

2007-08-03 Diskussionsfäden Peter Guhl
Hello Per Jessen schrieb: Philip Iezzi wrote: TAP/UCP protocol, attached ISDN-Modem [...] It's a little expensive if you have many SMS'es - does anyone know who to contact (e.g. at Swisscom) to get a package-deal with a direct TCP interface? There's a service provider called aspsms we used

Re: [swinog] AS6730 unreachable from some parts of the net ??

2007-05-11 Diskussionsfäden Peter Guhl
Hi Philippe Strauss schrieb: AS6730 is unreachable for at least us (DFi, AS12333) and anonymouse.org. I've tried our both upstreams AS702 and AS5511 with the same result. verified using www.romandie.com (195.141.38.35) and www.sunrise.ch as (195.141.106.96) target adresses. BGP table looks

Re: [swinog] AS6730 unreachable from some parts of the net ??

2007-05-11 Diskussionsfäden Peter Guhl
Hi Philippe Strauss schrieb: AS6730 is unreachable for at least us (DFi, AS12333) and anonymouse.org. I've tried our both upstreams AS702 and AS5511 with the same result. verified using www.romandie.com (195.141.38.35) and www.sunrise.ch as (195.141.106.96) target adresses. BGP table looks

[swinog] novell.com down?

2006-10-26 Diskussionsfäden Peter Guhl
Hello I have some urgent work to do needing Novell's website. A traceroute looks like that: 5 62-2-74-177.static.cablecom.ch (62.2.74.177) 6.714 ms 4.109 ms 4.693 ms 6 * * * 7 * * * 8 ch-gva01a-ra1-so-0-0-0.aorta.net (213.46.171.1) 16.105 ms 18.989 ms 18.040 ms 9

Re: [swinog] bluewin.ch down?

2006-09-29 Diskussionsfäden Peter Guhl
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 04:31:01PM +0200, Matthias Hertzog wrote: Is anyone out there able to connect to www.bluewin.ch? Even their ADSL seems to be down / unreachable. Same here. Neither bluewin.ch nor swisscom.ch nor ipplus.ch can be reached. A customer having IPPLUS-Uplink is down too. His

Re: [swinog] bluewin.ch down?

2006-09-29 Diskussionsfäden Peter Guhl
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 05:01:54PM +0200, Richard Klingler wrote: Is anyone out there able to connect to www.bluewin.ch? Even their ADSL seems to be down / unreachable. Nope... [...] Tested from magnet/cyberlink. It seems to be like that right now: Cablecom: No chance SolNet: Extremely

Re: [swinog] bluewin.ch down?

2006-09-29 Diskussionsfäden Peter Guhl
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 05:17:22PM +0200, Marcel Prisi wrote: Richard Klingler a ?crit : Matthias Hertzog schrieb: Is anyone out there able to connect to www.bluewin.ch? Even their ADSL seems to be down / unreachable. Nope... Cablecom is mostly down ... try calling their support !

Re: [swinog] bluewin.ch down?

2006-09-29 Diskussionsfäden Peter Guhl
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 05:17:22PM +0200, Marcel Prisi wrote: Cablecom is mostly down ... try calling their support ! I have no problems reaching Cablecom Websites and our own Servers through SolNet. I don't think SolNet is connected to Cablecom - but I might be wrong. Regards Peter -- Wer