Peter Keel wrote:
> * on the Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 07:02:18AM -0700, Stanislav Sinyagin wrote:
>> why doesn't someone create a public Skype chat for SwiNOG?
>> I think more people on this list have skype than IRC
>> client software (me, for example :-)
>
> I don't. And I WON'T.
>
> I've done to
Jeroen Massar wrote:
> And of course, with Open Source: did you check every single line of
> the source, and that of the compiler, and all the tools that that was
> made with etc etc etc? Ah, indeed you didn't, thus please don't claim
> that "Open Source" is "more secure" because you have the sour
Jeroen Massar wrote:
> Peter Keel wrote:
>> * on the Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 07:02:18AM -0700, Stanislav Sinyagin wrote:
>>> why doesn't someone create a public Skype chat for SwiNOG?
>>> I think more people on this list have skype than IRC
>>> client software (me, for example :-)
>> I don't. And
Salut, Per,
On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 07:38:56 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
> The idea of open source is not so much that you get to check it
> yourself, but much more that it is open for hundreds of thousands of
> other people to check. If for instance the quality/security of a
> piece of code is proporti
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 13:11:45 +0200
Tonnerre Lombard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 07:38:56 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
> > The idea of open source is not so much that you get to check it
> > yourself, but much more that it is open for hundreds of thousands of
> > other people to che
Salut, Attila,
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 13:31:10 +0200, Attila Kinali wrote:
> Can you name some of these recent publications?
> I'd be much interested to read them.
Sag ich nicht, selber suchen.
Tonnerre
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
Salut, Marco,
On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 08:47:41 +0200, Marco Fretz wrote:
> I usually don't have a look at the code at all. But point is, it's
> code, tested and build by a community not a closed company with their
> own, secret business goals...! I don't want be a victim of global
> marketing data col
Am 7.10.2008 8:47 Uhr, Marco Fretz schrieb:
> That's not the point. Of course we don't check the whole source code. I
> usually don't have a look at the code at all. But point is, it's code,
> tested and build by a community not a closed company with their own,
> secret business goals...! I don't
Hey, Ihsan,
On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 22:53:28 +0200, Ihsan Dogan wrote:
> One of the big reasons why people are buying commercial software
> products is, that they can get support and SLA. Most of the open
> source projects cannot provide that.
Not by themselves, but you can get that support through o
* on the Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 06:50:54PM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> > I've done too much cmputer security, and now I've got a
> > déformation professionelle. I won't use closed software
> > for anything crucial like "communication";
>
> You don't use Cisco's or Junipers? How do you use the Inte
maybe your not aware but skype is a p2p tool, servers just exists for the
directory, or the gates .. so wiretapping is just possible on the gate while
calling a PSTN partitiant. but as we allready heard most using skype, the
possibility of badmans communication will stay P2P
to confuse the wire
11 matches
Mail list logo
