[swinog] Pro / Contra Smarthosting

2012-05-24 Thread Benoit Panizzon
Heya Another one on about the same topic. Business Customer with own Mailserver. They ofter want to know, which of our mailservers they can use as smarthost. We usualy tell them, that they operate an own fully connected mailserver which does not need any smarthost to deliver email to the world

Re: [swinog] Pro / Contra Smarthosting

2012-05-24 Thread Oliver Schad
On Thu, 24 May 2012 17:07:58 +0200 Benoit Panizzon wrote: > Business Customer with own Mailserver. They ofter want to know, which > of our mailservers they can use as smarthost. We usualy tell them, > that they operate an own fully connected mailserver which does not > need any smarthost to deliv

Re: [swinog] Pro / Contra Smarthosting

2012-05-24 Thread Jeroen Massar
On 2012-05-24 17:07 , Benoit Panizzon wrote: > Heya > > Another one on about the same topic. > > Business Customer with own Mailserver. They ofter want to know, which of our > mailservers they can use as smarthost. We usualy tell them, that they operate > an own fully connected mailserver which

Re: [swinog] Pro / Contra Smarthosting

2012-05-24 Thread Fabian Wenk
Hello Benoit On 24.05.2012 17:07, Benoit Panizzon wrote: Some do not agree. The reasons the tell us are: - It Tech XY has told them that sending via a smarthost is much more reliable. And the customer is loosing the possibility to check on his own, if an e-mail has been delivered or is still