Per Jessen wrote:
> We have been thinking about SRS for a while - I'm wondering if SRS
> is "safe" for mailservers that don't implement SPF/SRS? (I'll do my
> research anyway, but just in case you know right away).
Looking at the status of libsrs2, I'm not very impressed. Also, we're a
postfix
Daniel Roethlisberger wrote:
> Per Jessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-02-05:
>> We've got a customer whose emails (from other people but filtered by
>> us) are frequently being rejected by Netstreams harsh SPF-check.
>> I've asked Netstream to add our servers to their whitelist, but
>> nothing has h
Per Jessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-02-05:
> We've got a customer whose emails (from other people but filtered by
> us) are frequently being rejected by Netstreams harsh SPF-check. I've
> asked Netstream to add our servers to their whitelist, but nothing has
> happened.
As a more generic alternat
Per Jessen wrote:
> We've got a customer whose emails (from other people but filtered by
> us) are frequently being rejected by Netstreams harsh SPF-check. I've
> asked Netstream to add our servers to their whitelist, but nothing has
> happened.
I was just wondering -
1) how many of you guys u
We've got a customer whose emails (from other people but filtered by us)
are frequently being rejected by Netstreams harsh SPF-check. I've
asked Netstream to add our servers to their whitelist, but nothing has
happened.
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg
--
http://www.spamchek.com/ - your spam is our bu
5 matches
Mail list logo
