Re: [swinog] bluewin.ch down?

2006-09-29 Thread Peter Guhl
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 04:31:01PM +0200, Matthias Hertzog wrote: > Is anyone out there able to connect to www.bluewin.ch? Even their ADSL > seems to be down / unreachable. Same here. Neither bluewin.ch nor swisscom.ch nor ipplus.ch can be reached. A customer having IPPLUS-Uplink is down too. Hi

Re: [swinog] bluewin.ch down?

2006-09-29 Thread Richard Klingler
Matthias Hertzog schrieb: > Hi there! > > Is anyone out there able to connect to www.bluewin.ch? Even their ADSL > seems to be down / unreachable. Nope... donald:~ jedi$ telnet www.bluewin.ch 80 Trying 195.186.3.80... Connected to www.bluewin.ch. Escape character is '^]'. get / Error 501 Not Im

Re: [swinog] bluewin.ch down?

2006-09-29 Thread Marcel Prisi
Richard Klingler a écrit : > Matthias Hertzog schrieb: > >> Hi there! >> >> Is anyone out there able to connect to www.bluewin.ch? Even their ADSL >> seems to be down / unreachable. >> > > Nope... > > donald:~ jedi$ telnet www.bluewin.ch 80 > Trying 195.186.3.80... > Connected to www.blu

Re: [swinog] bluewin.ch down?

2006-09-29 Thread Peter Guhl
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 05:01:54PM +0200, Richard Klingler wrote: > > Is anyone out there able to connect to www.bluewin.ch? Even their ADSL > > seems to be down / unreachable. > > Nope... [...] > Tested from magnet/cyberlink. It seems to be like that right now: Cablecom: No chance SolNet: Ext

Re: [swinog] bluewin.ch down?

2006-09-29 Thread Peter Guhl
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 05:17:22PM +0200, Marcel Prisi wrote: > Richard Klingler a ?crit : > > Matthias Hertzog schrieb: > >> Is anyone out there able to connect to www.bluewin.ch? Even their ADSL > >> seems to be down / unreachable. > > Nope... > > > Cablecom is mostly down ... try calling the

RE: [swinog] bluewin.ch down?

2006-09-29 Thread Andrei Sagalaev
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Klingler Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 5:02 PM To: swinog@swinog.ch Subject: Re: [swinog] bluewin.ch down? Matthias Hertzog schrieb: > Hi there! > > Is anyone out there able to connect to www.bluewin.ch? Even their > ADSL seems to be down / unreac

Re: [swinog] bluewin.ch down?

2006-09-29 Thread Nik Hug
Tested from magnet/cyberlink. It seems to be like that right now: Cablecom: No chance yeap there is somethink ongoing. traceroutes outbound from ip+ in direction cablecom/former solpa stopped at i79tix-015-xxx1-1.bb.ip-plus.net SolNet: Extremely Slow; too slow for Webbrowsers we lea

Re: [swinog] bluewin.ch down?

2006-09-29 Thread Peter Guhl
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 05:17:22PM +0200, Marcel Prisi wrote: > Cablecom is mostly down ... try calling their support ! I have no problems reaching Cablecom Websites and our own Servers through SolNet. I don't think SolNet is connected to Cablecom - but I might be wrong. Regards Peter -- Wer

Re: [swinog] bluewin.ch down?

2006-09-29 Thread Peter Guhl
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 05:29:40PM +0200, Nik Hug wrote: > >>Tested from magnet/cyberlink. > > > >It seems to be like that right now: > >Cablecom: No chance > > yeap there is somethink ongoing. > traceroutes outbound from ip+ in direction cablecom/former solpa stopped > at i79tix-015-xxx1-1.bb.ip

Re: [swinog] bluewin.ch down?

2006-10-01 Thread Tonnerre LOMBARD
Salut, On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 05:01:54PM +0200, Richard Klingler wrote: > get / > Error 501 Not Implemented > Error 501 Not Implemented > Powered by http://errors.zeus.com/";>Zeus > Technology Just for the record: the correct syntax is GET / HTTP/1.1 Host: www.blaufenster.ch Connection: close

Re: [swinog] bluewin.ch down?

2006-10-02 Thread Daniel Lorch
Hi > Just for the record: the correct syntax is > > GET / HTTP/1.1 > Host: www.blaufenster.ch > Connection: close Unless you want to do the "chunked" transfer-decoding by hand, this should better be HTTP/1.0. You can then also leave out the "Connection: close", because 1.0 didn't support keep-al

blaufenster... (was: Re: [swinog] bluewin.ch down?)

2006-10-10 Thread Nico -telmich- Schottelius
Just for your information, the domain blaufenster.ch is still available ;-) Don't know whether bluewin will be happy if an ISP buys it nor whether the buyer will be happy with it. Still wondering that a big, nine letter company, does not use it for error messages in their operating system. Nico