I would suggest asking a few people that are not familiar with the program
what they think of the name choices and if they like one better than the
others.
On Wed, 25 Jul 2001 16:33:18 -0700 "David Trotz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
OK, now that we have some clarity from Troy on
th
It looked like OpenSword was the hands down winner but I kinda liked some of
those last suggestions that played on the name a bit.
OpenSword, OpenSword, OpenSword
Does this count as three votes? ;-}
> This brings us to our final question: What place, then, is
> given to BibleTime, Diatheke, GnomeSword, OpenSword (or whatever the
> Windows frontend is dubbed), and all the other projects that USE The
> SWORD Project as their base? To keep from dubbing all software having
> anything to
OK, now that we have some clarity from Troy on the
name issue maybe we can pin down a new name for the Win32 front end a.k.a.
BibleCS.
It looked like OpenSword was the hands down winner
but I kinda liked some of those last suggestions that played on the name a
bit.
So unless I am out of
With this letter, I hope to clear up some of the recent 'haze' between
The SWORD Project, CrossWire Bible Society, and the relationships of the
frontends that share our goals and code.
CrossWire Bible Society
---
CrossWire Bible Society is an organization that starte
Hi!
This is Joachim from the BibleTime developers. At the moment I'm working on
the autoconf stuff to find out automatically the type of the distrbution and
the version of it. We have it already working for SuSE, Red Hat, Mandrake and
Debian.
The distribution is used for the proper generation o
