Sorry guys. I'm move stuff off to another partition. Our MAILLOG file
filled up the partition as we where sending out about 5500 off-topic
emails a day! :) Thanks for trying to move this stuff over.
-Troy
Mike Dougherty wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2001-12-21 at 16:06, Troy A. Griffitts wrot
On Fri, 2001-12-21 at 16:06, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
> Ok, guys... Thanks for the interesting conversation. This is official
> notice to take these threads to the fireside newsgroup:
>
> news://crosswire.org/crosswire.fireside
I seem to be having a little trouble connecting...
[mjd@abr
In a message dated 12/22/2001 9:07:03 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I also have a moral ``opportunity'' with requiring users of a Bible program
to own software written and controlled by a selfish, cheating, predatory and
monopolistic corporation whose directors and the lik
>
>
>A similar anology for evolution is the observation that an earthquake which
>struck a quarry was able to loft a rock up one stope. This is then
>extrapolated to ``so it is possible that enough earthquakes would loft the
>rock up all of the stopes and out of the quarry.'' Well, yes, possibl
On Sunday 23 December 2001 10:32, Leon Brooks wrote:
> Didn't read down far enough.
And... error 400, no space on device when writing article.
Cheers; Leon
> I get the impression that our users and front end authors would
> appreciate a 1.5.3 release to be sooner rather than later, in which case
> I think we ought to plan on a 1.5.4 release.
This is correct. We'd appreciate smaller and more frequent releases, which
could be done by implementing s
> Most of the InstallMgr code is cross-platform, thanks to Troy's port of
> VCL to Linux. To my understanding, InstallMgr already runs in Linux for
> copying modules from the CD. That means all that needs to be done is to
> add FTP capabilities using an off-the-shelf FTP library.
Sounds good. T
Is there a list of tasks to do? What has been done so far?
Mike Dougherty wrote:
> On Thu, 2001-12-20 at 19:45, James Stauffer wrote:
>
>>I am a Java developer and am interested in helping. I read much of the
>>recent thread in the archive about the java port. I don't know any of
>>the cur
> > 2) general book support
>
> Should probably wait to 1.5.5 or later, too big a change.
> Requires a lot of work in the frontends.
Support in the API doesn't necessitate support in the frontends. I know
BibleCS is going to require a serious rewrite, probably using the
prototype as a model.
