In a message dated 2/23/2003 6:33:07 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Joachim,
Thanks for the interface idea! I appreciate the time you and your
brother took and your ideas. I don't think I like the idea of poping up
new browser windows. I don't mind a _Create New View_ b
In a message dated 2/22/2003 9:16:03 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Okay, my guestimates were off. I ran statistics on our downloads in the
last 5 weeks 76% of downloads were of English modules, 17% were of other
Latin script modules, 4% were of original language modules, and
In a message dated 2/22/2003 9:16:03 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Modules in scripts unsupported by the browser can also be transliterated
to Latin pretty easily,
or you can change those brower to support it. For example, Mozilla does not support Burmese, and I am making
Joachim,
Thanks for the interface idea! I appreciate the time you and your
brother took and your ideas. I don't think I like the idea of poping up
new browser windows. I don't mind a _Create New View_ button that would
let the user open a new browser window, but not as a default function.
H
I appreciate the comments on standards. It's clear that we need to do
our best to accommodate as many languages and browsers as we can. My
hope is to do this and still allow others to turn features on (if they
have the support) for a richer user interface.
I don't believe further comment on t
In a message dated 2/23/2003 11:32:36 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If Troy is going to do the implementation, I think the options are Java,
C, and C++. He seems to have religious objections to Perl and PHP. :)
Since JSword is not at the level needed (most of the module d
In a message dated 2/22/2003 9:16:03 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Okay, my guestimates were off. I ran statistics on our downloads in the
last 5 weeks 76% of downloads were of English modules, 17% were of other
Latin script modules, 4% were of original language modules, and
In a message dated 2/22/2003 8:54:17 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>One option here instead of _javascript_
>would be to use the "title" attribute of the href tag. I created a little
>one verse demo:
I am pretty sure that will work in all browsers, too.
even those text base
In a message dated 2/22/2003 7:53:49 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And I reply:
Yes, you are correct. Technically, all of those broswers support
_javascript_, but without the proper DOM support, what use is _javascript_
in a browser for real applications?
DOM level 0 suppo
On 23 Feb 2003, Derek Neighbors wrote:
> If you want lots of people to propogate this work, you will need to
> construct it in a way that is accessible for them to install and make
> available to their user base. I assume that fulfilling the great
> commission is the goal and so getting something
>On the technical part use JSP (or whatever) modules which do the whole
stuff
> for you, e.g. template systems which only get the content to merge it into a
> static layout. This helps a lot, because other people which are better than
> you in HTML design can make the pages and you fill in the c
Troy,
me and my brother spent some minutes on a possible layout and came up with
http://joachim.ansorgs.de/sword/. This is just a suggestion. The navigation
window is on the left. There can be multiple windows which are used to read a
module. The search would open a new window to browse the sea
On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, Don A. Elbourne Jr. wrote:
> would be to use the "title" attribute of the href tag. I created a little
> one verse demo:
> http://elbourne.org/temp/titlerollo.htm
>
elinks (text mode browser) shows the bible text, but nothin else. Lynx
also. Konqueror and Mozilla show a popup
On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, Matthew Donadio wrote:
>
> ECMAScript (EMCA-262) is the official standard for JavaScript.
Or is it standard for ECMAScript, for which JavaScript is an
imlementation? :)
Yours,
Eeli Kaikkonen (Mr.), Oulu, Finland
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (with no x)
___
14 matches
Mail list logo
