Mark
I am forwarding your request to the SWORD Project developers.
You can learn more about the Sword Project at www.crosswire.org
- Forwarded Message -
From: Mark Joseph Kiwummulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 04:21:46 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Lugand
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> Running diatheke threw up a few problems, some maybe known, some
> probably not.
Diatheke is fairly old and hasn't received any real attention in about 5
years, so there could potentially be new incompatibilities resulting
from development of the API that has not been r
The patch below fixes nothing of my list, at least as far as I could
determine , but I think is nevertheless a correct change.
Please could someone comment on it?
Peter
Index: corediatheke.cpp
===
--- corediatheke.cpp(revision
Reported in 2005 here:
http://securitytracker.com/alerts/2005/Jan/1012961.html
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> Incidentally this was reported in 2007 to the mailing list, but it
> appears that on neither occasion anything changed.
>
> Should we not at least either take down diatheke.pl or change the
Running diatheke threw up a few problems, some maybe known, some
probably not.
1) diatheke -v causes a segmentation fault. Not sure whether it should
do anything anyway, but I am sure that it should not crash. Maybe thsi
exposed some more significant problem?
2) the -or option does zilch for me.
A few questions recently have illuminated the fact that we don't have an
active make system maintainer. Specifically, the lib*.so.* thread, and
this thread require someone with extensive autotools and ldconfig
standards experience to take responsibility for these questions,
implementation, cro
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> The Man page is pretty good. I spent a few hours trying to readup on
> them and creating one, only to lose it in a crash of gmanedit. But now
> what I re-created is still not as good as this one of yours
>
> What stops you from submitting it?
>
>
Nothing, I advocated i
Incidentally this was reported in 2007 to the mailing list, but it
appears that on neither occasion anything changed.
Should we not at least either take down diatheke.pl or change the
associated readme into something that make it abundantly clear that this
is not a working cgi script but solely de
The Man page is pretty good. I spent a few hours trying to readup on
them and creating one, only to lose it in a crash of gmanedit. But now
what I re-created is still not as good as this one of yours
What stops you from submitting it?
Peter
___
sword-d
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> Thanks!! This works indeed.
>
> I was trying to bolt together a man page and stumbled over this.
>
>
I have a man page for diatheke. Available in http://iki.fi/eelik/sword.
07 seems to be the latest.
--Eeli Kaikkonen
___
sw
Is this fixed?
Daniel Glassey wrote:
> Is there anyone that understands diatheke that can verify and diagnose
> this asap?
>
> Daniel
>
> P.S. Since it is a security bug why was it made public before there
> was a chance to fix it?
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Dan Denniso
Thanks for checking this.
The wiki text is a little outdated.
Manfred
Am 22.10.2008 um 05:09 schrieb Nathan Youngman:
>
> Today I ran into this problem too, and sent an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I was going to update the MacSword wiki page which still mentions
> 1.2.x.
>
> ---
> Nathan
Thanks!! This works indeed.
I was trying to bolt together a man page and stumbled over this.
Peter
Eeli Kaikkonen wrote:
> Peter von Kaehne wrote:
>> Looking at the diatheke usage message there is a problem
>>
>> diatheke -b system (e.g. "diatheke -b system modulelist")
>>
>> should deliver s
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> Looking at the diatheke usage message there is a problem
>
> diatheke -b system (e.g. "diatheke -b system modulelist")
>
> should deliver some basic facts about the installed modules etc.
>
> It just delives the usage message again.
>
>
It should be, and is, -b system
Ok, looking further, I was obviously (partially) wrong. The code to
handle "-b system" is in diathekecore.cpp
But it is never reached. And I do not understand code enough to tell you
why. I tried to run diatheke in gdb, but could not figure my way through
that either.
So, over to the rest of you.
Looking at the diatheke usage message there is a problem
diatheke -b system (e.g. "diatheke -b system modulelist")
should deliver some basic facts about the installed modules etc.
It just delives the usage message again.
In fact, looking at the source code, without being a programmer, I do
no
Hi Peter,
Thanks for the reply and suggestion.
The source code can be download from
http://www.zogamonline.com/index.php?option=com_docman&Itemid=156
Regarding distribution of Paite Bible Module via Crosswire's server, i think
we need to get that permission form Bible Society of India the copyrig
Dear Hlun,
Congratulations for getting the Holy Bible in your language into
electronically distributable form! I hope and pray it will be a huge
blessing for everyone.
Wrt the use of libsword - You are free to create any frontend using the
sword engine and distribute it freely as you like - just
Hi All,
The Paite e-Holy Bible software used sword engine as it core component and
its front end is designed to view any Sword Bible module.
I hope i did not do any thing wrong in that and if there is any things which
we violate let us know. We are ready to rectify any mistake we make.
Out inten
19 matches
Mail list logo
