On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 4:03 AM, Jonathan Marsden wrote:
>
> Jonathan Morgan wrote (after quoting my entire lengthy message):
>
> > In my opinon, the expected compiler to be used for Windows binaries is
> > VC++, whether it is proprietary or not (for example, ask Mozilla, or
> > OpenOffice, or Pyth
Matthew Talbert wrote:
I am not a programmer ( I'm a wanna be) but have access to MS Visual Studio
6, 2005 & 2008, so options 1 and 3 would be the most beneficial for me. I
think having all of these options documented on the wiki as David Haslam has
suggested would be valuable.
Feel free to
Matthew Talbert wrote:
I am not a programmer ( I'm a wanna be) but have access to MS Visual Studio
6, 2005 & 2008, so options 1 and 3 would be the most beneficial for me. I
think having all of these options documented on the wiki as David Haslam has
suggested would be valuable.
Feel free
> I am not a programmer ( I'm a wanna be) but have access to MS Visual Studio
> 6, 2005 & 2008, so options 1 and 3 would be the most beneficial for me. I
> think having all of these options documented on the wiki as David Haslam has
> suggested would be valuable.
Feel free to put this on the wiki
Matthew Talbert wrote:
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Gerald Zimmerman wrote:
I have an additional request. Windows, as delivered, makes everything easy for
"frontenders" but ignores any thirst for the knowledge of compiling. I suspect
that any of us Windows users could use the most rec
Hi Matthew,
Please see
http://www.crosswire.org/wiki/Talk:Tutorial:Compiling_%26_Installing_SWORD
http://www.crosswire.org/wiki/Talk:Tutorial:Compiling_%26_Installing_SWORD
Let's have the useful stuff where it is easily accessed.
David
Matthew Talbert wrote:
>
>
> Are you wanting:
>
> 1. I
> I thought this is the kind of use case we are talking about here --
> people (SWORD power users, if you like) wanting current SWORD code (in
> binary form) for Windows, because the recent SWORD library svn versions
> have bug fixes and enhancements which earlier, released, SWORD binaries
> for Wi
> This would seem to suggest that the Xiphos 3.1.1a -supplied version of
> osis2mod, which says it is r2169, is really r2400 (1.6.0) or later, in
> disguise? It doesn't appear to have the -d option or the -v option (its
> help output lacks them, at least).
Yes, actually it is a more recent versio
> I don't see a clear way for a Windows only user to download a binary
> osis2mod.exe that works for (for example) encrypting a module that has a
> non-KJV versification. Am I just not aware of a good location from
> which to download such a binary? Or, as I rather suspect, would such a
> user in
Jonathan Marsden wrote:
> This would seem to suggest that the Xiphos 3.1.1a -supplied version of
> osis2mod, which says it is r2169, is really r2400 (1.6.0) or later, in
> disguise? It doesn't appear to have the -d option or the -v option ...
It *does* have -v, my mistake. But r2169 is from May
Matthew Talbert wrote:
> The binaries of SWORD itself (including the utilities) are already
> available and have been available since very soon after the release
> of 1.6.0, both from Crosswire and packaged with Xiphos.
This would seem to suggest that the Xiphos 3.1.1a -supplied version of
osis2m
Hi Jonathan,
Visual Studio is the best way to compile on Windows. I used to compile with
mingw + msys, but the environment feels slow and clumsy, and it produces
larger, slower executables. And Visual Studio is free - you can download the
express editions.
Visual Studio seems to me much easier to
I'll just say once again, that the "sword binaries" people are looking
for at this point, is BibleCS 1.6.0 (which doesn't exist yet). There
is *no* method of compiling this with gcc, so there's no point in even
attempting it. The binaries of SWORD itself (including the utilities)
are already availa
Jonathan Morgan wrote (after quoting my entire lengthy message):
> In my opinon, the expected compiler to be used for Windows binaries is
> VC++, whether it is proprietary or not (for example, ask Mozilla, or
> OpenOffice, or Python).
Expected by whom? Microsoft does not provide a compiler and l
14 matches
Mail list logo
