thank you Karl
that helps a lot.
blessing
On 2010/05/05, at 0:31, Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
Nakamaru Kunio writes:
if porting Personal commentary is too global in Sword to fix,
adding a conversion tool in Xiphos to produce Sword Commentary
Module from Personal Module will work for my situatio
Nakamaru Kunio writes:
> if porting Personal commentary is too global in Sword to fix,
> adding a conversion tool in Xiphos to produce Sword Commentary
> Module from Personal Module will work for my situation.
For the time being, this nasty little pipeline will give you what you
need:
mod2imp P
I made the change for Xiphos not to generate "xiphos.url" any more. It
will still recognize it, for backward compatibility, but it now expects
(from the engine) and generates (internally) only "passagestudy.jsp."
It'll be in our 3.2, sometime this summer.
_
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
> Yup, you're right. I didn't even notice (didn't recall, haven't thought
> about in eons) that the link encoding uses a Xiphos-internal reference.
>
> And we fill it with HTML because that's the nature of the editor that
> Xiphos uses (gtkh
From the user's point of view of raising this issue,
even if "Personal" commentary is not portable, it does
not bother me at this case.
I just need a tool to build a Sword "commentary" module
with an full Bible resources environment, like parallel view
, Dictionaries and other commentaries.
if
A late thought...
Considering that there are no HTML-to-AnythingElse filters, it would
appear that this sort of locally-edited content is inherently
application-specific. What does BibleCS generate? Raw RTF? Same
problem, going the other way. Yes, there does exist
src/modules/filters/rtfhtml.c
Yup, you're right. I didn't even notice (didn't recall, haven't thought
about in eons) that the link encoding uses a Xiphos-internal reference.
And we fill it with HTML because that's the nature of the editor that
Xiphos uses (gtkhtml3), so getRawEntry() is what we find useful.
I don't have any
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
> Nic Carter writes:
> > I haven't looked at how Xiphos does it's personal commentaries, but if
> > it's the standard commentary format, it should work.
>
> I just experimented with Personal myself, and there's definitely a
> problem in PS.
