I also forgot to mention the following:
If we want to encourage people to use XML because it can validate and
detect errors, etc, why don't we use XML utilities with that
functionality ourselves?
And, it's not like this work hasn't already been partially tackled
with JSword's library from which w
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
> Having finally returned from a hectic 2 weeks of conferences, and lots
> to do before leaving for Christmas, I'm not sure I'm up for a heated,
> passionate debate about technologies right now, but by all means, please
> commence the publi
Thanks Troy,
Probably I am the worst person to answer first, but it was me who threw
the matter once again into the ring. Hence...
On 30/11/10 19:08, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
> Having finally returned from a hectic 2 weeks of conferences, and lots
> to do before leaving for Christmas, I'm not sur
On 11/30/2010 2:38 PM, Greg Hellings wrote:
I realize you'll probably be working off of plenty of source texts,
but for those where the source text might not exist or for any other
number of reasons your conversion might go a little faster if the
filters in the engine were in top shape - provid
I realize you'll probably be working off of plenty of source texts,
but for those where the source text might not exist or for any other
number of reasons your conversion might go a little faster if the
filters in the engine were in top shape - provided you wanted to pass
them through that.
With o
On 11/30/2010 6:58 AM, Greg Hellings wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Chris Little wrote:
It's also worth noting that only the OSIS and TEI counts are likely to
increase much in the future.
For your work, perhaps. But with the current state of OSIS vs ThML
that I mentioned in my em
Having finally returned from a hectic 2 weeks of conferences, and lots
to do before leaving for Christmas, I'm not sure I'm up for a heated,
passionate debate about technologies right now, but by all means, please
commence the public discussion.
Let me start by saying that everyone (I believe) agr
"Peter von Kaehne" writes:
> I would much rather we produced good modules and filed endless numbers of
> bug reports against any application and the library for non-compliance if
> things which should work do not work, instead of targetting the oddities
> and non-compliant aspects of each applicat
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 03:35:13PM +0100, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
>
> > Von: "Mario Marín"
>
> >you can consider this thread as closed.
>
> LOL - if you think you could stop a developing flamefest over OSIS vs
> ThML between us CrossWire lot so easily, you have a lot to learn
> still... ;-)
I
Greg Hellings writes:
> 2) I can provide an external CSS stylesheet along with my module.
> Then I could still use OSIS and, assuming well-defined use of HTML+CSS
> classes being produced from OSIS by the engine, I could style the
> module the way I desired. This would not require terribly much w
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
>
>> Von: Greg Hellings
>
>> However, a few problems arise. Namely, I have no control over the
>> display of the text in my target applications (Xiphos and Bibletime)
>> when I use OSIS. You, being in the semantics-please camp, might thin
> Von: Greg Hellings
> However, a few problems arise. Namely, I have no control over the
> display of the text in my target applications (Xiphos and Bibletime)
> when I use OSIS. You, being in the semantics-please camp, might think
> that's a good thing. You've stymied my attempt, as a conten
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Chris Little wrote:
> OSIS 212 modules
> ThML 156 modules
> Plaintext 42 modules
> GBF 30 modules
> TEI 22 modules
And Xiphos' repository has another 41 ThML and 7 OSIS (I also see 1
plain, 1 TEI and 1 GBF) which makes it 219 OSIS and 197 ThML. My
InstallMgr rep
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Trevor Jenkins
wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Greg Hellings wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:30 PM, DM Smith wrote:
>> > ROFL is semantic markup. It is a level 1 heading. Given that this
>> > is one of HTML's title markup, one probably can deduce that it is
> Von: "Mario Marín"
>you can consider this thread as closed.
LOL - if you think you could stop a developing flamefest over OSIS vs ThML
between us CrossWire lot so easily, you have a lot to learn still... ;-)
This thread is a repetitive occurence, usually around this time of the year
when
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 09:07:16PM -0500, Brian J. Dumont wrote:
> On 11/29/2010 05:18 PM, David Haslam wrote:
> > Though this enquiry has generated a number of "asides", mmfmarin is still
> > awaiting help on using this.
> >
> To summarize: it seems to me, that we've presented mmfmarin with two
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Greg Hellings wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:30 PM, DM Smith wrote:
> > ROFL is semantic markup. It is a level 1 heading. Given that this
> > is one of HTML's title markup, one probably can deduce that it is a title.
> > Note that IE, FireFox, Opera, Safari are not con
17 matches
Mail list logo
