Hey Jaak,
I can see how this is useful, though I believe the standard way to
handle this with any package is to define what you need with, e.g.,
pkg-config --atleast-version=1.6.2 sword
You can define what you want, like INCLUDES_WLC_VERSIFICATION, or
whatever you need to have special code
Jaak, Troy,
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Troy A. Griffitts scr...@crosswire.org wrote:
Hey Jaak,
I can see how this is useful, though I believe the standard way to handle
this with any package is to define what you need with, e.g.,
pkg-config --atleast-version=1.6.2 sword
In CMAKE this
I have discovered today that osis2mod output is incorrect for any text in
which the delimiters used for the *sID* milestone attribute are not the same
as the delimiters for the *eID* attribute in the same verse [or verse
range].
This phenomenon was encountered in one of the Myanmar Bibles
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 2:14 PM, David Haslam dfh...@googlemail.com wrote:
I have discovered today that osis2mod output is incorrect for any text in
which the delimiters used for the *sID* milestone attribute are not the same
as the delimiters for the *eID* attribute in the same verse [or verse
I'm not clear what you mean by delimiters? Can you provide an example of
the problem?
Thanks.
In Him,
DM
On 10/25/2011 03:14 PM, David Haslam wrote:
I have discovered today that osis2mod output is incorrect for any text in
which the delimiters used for the *sID* milestone attribute are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
On 25.10.2011 17:37, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
I can see how this is useful, though I believe the standard way to
handle this with any package is to define what you need with, e.g.,
pkg-config --atleast-version=1.6.2 sword
This alone does
Do you mean they are using single-quotes for one and double-quotes for
the other? That's certainly bad style, at the least. I'm not sure
whether it is well-formed XML. Did you happen to try validating?
An example, as DM requests, would help in diagnosis. Also, some
elaboration on output is
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 03:51:03PM -0700, Chris Little wrote:
Do you mean they are using single-quotes for one and double-quotes
for the other? That's certainly bad style, at the least. I'm not
sure whether it is well-formed XML. Did you happen to try
validating?
Using single and double
