Re: [sword-devel] USFM -> OSIS -> Sword

2012-03-08 Thread Kahunapule Michael Johnson
On 03/08/2012 03:53 PM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > Howzabout you grant us a smidgen of respect for the positively alarming > amount of effort that gets put into our collective software efforts and > our collective module creation skills. Waddayasay you don't use as your > starting assumption that we

Re: [sword-devel] USFM -> OSIS -> Sword

2012-03-08 Thread Kahunapule Michael Johnson
On 03/08/2012 12:46 AM, Jonathan Morgan wrote: Hi Michael, On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Kahunapule Michael Johnson wrote: On 03/07/2012 04:53 PM, Jonathan Morgan wrote:

Re: [sword-devel] USFM -> OSIS -> Sword

2012-03-08 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
Kahunapule Michael Johnson writes: > Chronic or excessive bugs, or bugs that are serious but don't get > fixed are a major problem. > Designed-in bugs that don't get fixed are show-stopper problems. I would be interested in -- entertained by -- even one example of any Sword program or library who

Re: [sword-devel] maintenance

2012-03-08 Thread DM Smith
It's back up and running. In Him, DM On Mar 8, 2012, at 6:27 AM, Troy A. Griffitts wrote: > Gonna be doing some bandaide maintenance over the next couple hours where > CrossWire will be unavailable. Sorry the inconvenience. > > Troy > > ___

[sword-devel] maintenance

2012-03-08 Thread Troy A. Griffitts
Gonna be doing some bandaide maintenance over the next couple hours where CrossWire will be unavailable. Sorry the inconvenience. Troy ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instr

Re: [sword-devel] USFM -> OSIS -> Sword

2012-03-08 Thread Jonathan Morgan
Hi Michael, On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Kahunapule Michael Johnson < kahunap...@mpj.cx> wrote: > On 03/07/2012 04:53 PM, Jonathan Morgan wrote: > > > ... I'm suggesting copyright is the wrong tool to use to enforce such > claims, since I can't see that it will actually target the one respo

Re: [sword-devel] USFM -> OSIS -> Sword

2012-03-08 Thread Peter von Kaehne
On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 00:22 -0800, David Haslam wrote: > Michael asks, > "Is there any way we can tag a module as being of a version that requires > support for alternate versification and/or support for RtoL scripts? > Then only front ends with that capability could display it, and we wouldn't >

Re: [sword-devel] USFM -> OSIS -> Sword

2012-03-08 Thread Peter von Kaehne
On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 22:13 -1000, Kahunapule Michael Johnson wrote: > I'm not really asking if The Sword Project is 100% bug free, but I'm testing > the waters to see if there is really an awareness here of the seriousness of > the importance of preserving all of the jots and tittles of Bible t

Re: [sword-devel] USFM -> OSIS -> Sword

2012-03-08 Thread David Haslam
Michael asks, "Just how serious is it if the versification isn't KJV-only? Will 3 John 1:15 or Romans 14:24-26 be discarded or fail to display?" The documented action of our module creation tools already addresses what happens if a passage falls beyond the specified v11n. The verse text is append

Re: [sword-devel] USFM -> OSIS -> Sword

2012-03-08 Thread David Haslam
Michael asks, "Is there any way we can tag a module as being of a version that requires support for alternate versification and/or support for RtoL scripts? Then only front ends with that capability could display it, and we wouldn't have to withhold the module from the front ends that don't." We

Re: [sword-devel] USFM -> OSIS -> Sword

2012-03-08 Thread Kahunapule Michael Johnson
On 03/07/2012 09:04 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote: > On 8.3.2012 07:14, Kahunapule Michael Johnson wrote: >> The #1 reason they give me for copyrighting Bibles is that they want >> some way to protect the text from corruption. Arguments to the >> contrary are futile. > > Can I ask for clarification here? Is