On 03/08/2012 03:53 PM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
> Howzabout you grant us a smidgen of respect for the positively alarming
> amount of effort that gets put into our collective software efforts and
> our collective module creation skills. Waddayasay you don't use as your
> starting assumption that we
On 03/08/2012 12:46 AM, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
Hi Michael,
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 5:14 PM,
Kahunapule Michael Johnson
wrote:
On 03/07/2012 04:53 PM,
Jonathan Morgan wrote:
Kahunapule Michael Johnson writes:
> Chronic or excessive bugs, or bugs that are serious but don't get
> fixed are a major problem.
> Designed-in bugs that don't get fixed are show-stopper problems.
I would be interested in -- entertained by -- even one example of any
Sword program or library who
It's back up and running.
In Him,
DM
On Mar 8, 2012, at 6:27 AM, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
> Gonna be doing some bandaide maintenance over the next couple hours where
> CrossWire will be unavailable. Sorry the inconvenience.
>
> Troy
>
> ___
Gonna be doing some bandaide maintenance over the next couple hours
where CrossWire will be unavailable. Sorry the inconvenience.
Troy
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instr
Hi Michael,
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Kahunapule Michael Johnson <
kahunap...@mpj.cx> wrote:
> On 03/07/2012 04:53 PM, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
>
>
> ... I'm suggesting copyright is the wrong tool to use to enforce such
> claims, since I can't see that it will actually target the one respo
On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 00:22 -0800, David Haslam wrote:
> Michael asks,
> "Is there any way we can tag a module as being of a version that requires
> support for alternate versification and/or support for RtoL scripts?
> Then only front ends with that capability could display it, and we wouldn't
>
On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 22:13 -1000, Kahunapule Michael Johnson wrote:
> I'm not really asking if The Sword Project is 100% bug free, but I'm testing
> the waters to see if there is really an awareness here of the seriousness of
> the importance of preserving all of the jots and tittles of Bible t
Michael asks,
"Just how serious is it if the versification isn't KJV-only? Will 3 John
1:15 or Romans 14:24-26 be discarded or fail to display?"
The documented action of our module creation tools already addresses what
happens if a passage falls beyond the specified v11n.
The verse text is append
Michael asks,
"Is there any way we can tag a module as being of a version that requires
support for alternate versification and/or support for RtoL scripts?
Then only front ends with that capability could display it, and we wouldn't
have to withhold the module from the front ends that don't."
We
On 03/07/2012 09:04 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> On 8.3.2012 07:14, Kahunapule Michael Johnson wrote:
>> The #1 reason they give me for copyrighting Bibles is that they want
>> some way to protect the text from corruption. Arguments to the
>> contrary are futile.
>
> Can I ask for clarification here? Is
11 matches
Mail list logo