Re: [sword-devel] filter patch

2012-12-13 Thread Greg Hellings
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Chris Little wrote: > Most of the uses of are found in the HTMLHREF filters, and I believe > almost all front ends use these filters. Nothing will change in those > filters, so nothing need be changed in front ends using HTMLHREF. The next version of Xiphos will

Re: [sword-devel] filter patch

2012-12-13 Thread Chris Little
On 12/13/2012 5:45 PM, crick...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I came across the following output in various filters: . A comment in the code talks about this being a silent html comment that the front-ends can replace if desired. However, that tag is not valid (x)html (I guess it used to be a valid co

Re: [sword-devel] filter patch

2012-12-13 Thread Ben Morgan
Hi Greg, On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Greg Hellings wrote: > ... > As to the matter of breaking front-ends, library upgrades are going to > do that anyway. The current development head of BibleTime does not > even compile against the current development head of SWORD because the > API has ch

Re: [sword-devel] filter patch

2012-12-13 Thread Greg Hellings
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Ben Morgan wrote: > G'day Ben, > > From the viewpoint of a frontend developer, I don't really want this change > committed. > > If this change is committed, it will break existing frontends which look for > , and it produces little or no benefit - may be invalid,

Re: [sword-devel] filter patch

2012-12-13 Thread cricketc
OK, thanks for the feedback Ben. I guess if it's not causing problems for any front-ends, there's no point in breaking existing code. -Ben On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Ben Morgan wrote: > G'day Ben, > > From the viewpoint of a frontend developer, I don't really want this change > committed.

Re: [sword-devel] filter patch

2012-12-13 Thread Ben Morgan
G'day Ben, >From the viewpoint of a frontend developer, I don't really want this change committed. If this change is committed, it will break existing frontends which look for , and it produces little or no benefit - may be invalid, but I think it will just get ignored. We already don't really h

[sword-devel] filter patch

2012-12-13 Thread cricketc
Hello, I came across the following output in various filters: . A comment in the code talks about this being a silent html comment that the front-ends can replace if desired. However, that tag is not valid (x)html (I guess it used to be a valid comment). I'm attaching a patch that replaces with

[sword-devel] The OSIS element ?

2012-12-13 Thread David Haslam
How about including in SWORD some suitable support for the element? With a GlobalOptionFilter to toggle the display of this (non-canonical) feature, which is used in some translations to identify the lover and the beloved in the Song of Songs. David -- View this message in context: http://