Thanks Nic. Yes.
Sent from my HTC
- Reply message -
From: "Nic Carter"
To: "SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum"
Subject: [sword-devel] Lexical fields
Date: Sun, Aug 25, 2013 07:11
Sorry for the brief top-reply:
I believe we only accept new lexica in the TEI format.
http://crossw
Sorry for the brief top-reply:
I believe we only accept new lexica in the TEI format.
http://crosswire.org/wiki/TEI_Dictionaries
I hope that helps! :)
On 25/08/2013, at 4:26 PM, "Timothy S. Nelson" wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Aug 2013, ref...@gmx.net wrote:
>
>> Lexica in sword are not build with O
On Sat, 24 Aug 2013, ref...@gmx.net wrote:
Lexica in sword are not build with OSIS.
Ah, I think I see. Are you referring to the fact that they have to be
converted to IMP files first?
Thanks,
-
| Name: Tim Nelso
On Sat, 24 Aug 2013, ref...@gmx.net wrote:
Lexica in sword are not build with OSIS.
Not 100% sure what you mean (probably due to my ignorance of SWORD).
I asked my lex/dict modules what their SourceType was, and they said:
bdbglosses_strongs.conf:SourceType=TEI
bosworthtoller.conf:SourceTy
Lexica in sword are not build with OSIS.
Sent from my HTC
- Reply message -
From: "Timothy S. Nelson"
To: "Chris Burrell"
Cc: "SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum"
Subject: [sword-devel] Lexical fields
Date: Sat, Aug 24, 2013 15:50
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013, Chris Burrell wrote:
> For
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013, Chris Burrell wrote:
For our lexicon, we don't use SWORD modules because they aren't flexible
enough. The main drawback was the lack of segregation of different parts of
data.
I'm assuming that by "Segregation", you mean that they didn't have a
wide enough variety of fi
