On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 07:25:15PM +0100, rj_qgsous_sword wrote:
>
>> and its Windows support (as of 2010) was reported to be much worse than
>> Hg's.
>>
>
> Let me emphasize "as of 2010" ... I don't use Windows myself (see the email
> address)
On 15 March 2014 18:25, rj_qgsous_sword wrote:
> I saw recently that there has been a good deal of conversation on this
> mailing list about Git. Personally, I think that Mercurial (Hg) is much
> better than Git, and I wanted to mention a few things regarding this:
>
> Although (as someone recentl
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 07:25:15PM +0100, rj_qgsous_sword wrote:
and its Windows support (as of 2010) was reported to be much
worse than Hg's.
Let me emphasize “as of 2010” … I don’t use Windows myself (see
the email address), but I’ve heard that http://msysgit.github.io/
is quite useful.
Be
