I don't understand what happened the first time.
I merely used Xiphos MM to install the updated module, then immediately
indexed it.
Second attempt:
First I removed the KJV module, then I installed version 2.7. This time the
module is OK.
Could there have been a bug in Xiphos 4.0.3 ?
Best
Maybe related to the server problem that we are currently experiencing since
about 5 hours ago.
HTTP connections overload, maybe also FTP.
The mail service is unaffected.
David
--
View this message in context:
http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/Announcing-KJV-2-7-tp4655132p4655137.html
Xiphos 4.0.4
- Implemented dynamic allocation enhancement to replace survivability fix.
- Updated language abbreviations to eliminate unknowns.
- Fixed module installation messages so they are not lost.
- Fixed abbrev support, to show abbrevs in all non-essential contexts.
- Fixed maximization
Thanks Karl,
Installed successfully in my Win7 x64 PC.
David
--
View this message in context:
http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/Xiphos-4-0-4-tp4655136p4655138.html
Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
sword-devel
On 08/30/2015 04:45 AM, David Haslam wrote:
Could there have been a bug in Xiphos 4.0.3 ?
Apparently not, as I got it correctly on my 1st attempt.
Anyway, all Xiphos does when installing an update is to remove the
existing module and re-install. Re-installing over an existing module
has had
Thank you. I'll trigger the OSISLemma
filter on the morphology tags.
On 08/28/2015 05:40 PM, DM Smith wrote:
Only use it if that attr has something other than Strong's
numbers.
Cent from my fone so theer mite be tipos.
Here is an OSIS file: https://ebible.org/Scriptures/eng-kjv_osis.zip
In fact, here are a multitude of OSIS files: https://ebible.org/Scriptures/.
On 08/30/2015 05:41 PM, DM Smith wrote:
That input should be OK. I’ll have to dig to see why. I may
You are right, DM. I did understand.
Thanks for the clarification!
:-)
On 08/30/2015 05:37 PM, DM Smith wrote:
I think you misunderstand. If the lemma attribute has other kinds
of lemma then use the
On 08/29/2015 10:42 AM, Karl Kleinpaste
wrote:
On 08/28/2015 10:18 PM, Kahunapule
Michael Johnson wrote:
At least as importantly,
how would Joe Average distinguish them?
Good question.
