I did just kick off this latest build against Rawhide and still got the
same error:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=36383425
--Greg
On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 11:28 PM Greg Hellings
wrote:
> https://app.vagrantup.com/ppc64le/boxes/fedora30
>
> That should allow you to bring
https://app.vagrantup.com/ppc64le/boxes/fedora30
That should allow you to bring up a local VM with Fedora 30 on ppc64le
using Vagrant. Only works on systems with a libvirt backend to Vagrant
(sudo dnf install vagrant vagrant-libvirt should do the trick on a Fedora
workstation, followed by
Michael, I would be interested to hear your logic for internationalizing
a numeric parser. I always assumed it wasn't as simply as providing
alternate symbol codes for 0-9. Think Roman Numerals (SWORD already
supports Roman Numerals). If it was as simply as swapping out, say 47
with an
Anyone have access to a PPC64LE box I can play on?
On 7/18/19 12:04 AM, Jaak Ristioja wrote:
> Yes, it is a sizeable patch. Although there might be hacks around this
> issue, getting rid of the reserved identifiers and using the fixed-width
> types from seems to be the correct approach to take.
All submitted translation updates have been integrated. Thank you
This revision also makes an attempt to improve line wrapping in the top
buttons for the Verse Study, Daily Devotion, and Library screens. If
you find that the text you've translated for one of these buttons
doesn't wrap well,
Thank you Michael,
What is Haiola?
I'm just curious to know if someone will take care of this problem. The
other current apps solution for bible in Myanmar proposed already the
myanmar numbers.
Le 20/07/2019 à 22:49, Michael Johnson a écrit :
> It is an important question. I have a way to handle
It is an important question. I have a way to handle it in other formats using
Haiola. I suspect that proper handling it in SWORD will take a design change.
In Haiola, the source chapter and verse numbers are always as in English. I can
select display chapter and verse numbers from many options.
Hello,
No body else have a proposition for this question? Should I open a bug
report?
Is it not an important question?
Best regards, Br Cyrille
Le 17/07/2019 à 23:14, David Haslam a écrit :
> Several other non-Roman scripts have their own digit characters
> corresponding to our 0-9.
>
> IMHO the
